On 23 January 2012 01:02, wrote:
> Regarding comments by Neil and Bertrand:
>
> I rewrote Stem::is_normal_stem the way Neil suggested. Looking at the
> code in Stem.cc, it appears that both ways are being used to check the
> style property. I don't know which is the more correct.
Strictly speak
Reviewers: Patrick McCarty, dak, mike_apollinemike.com, janek,
http://codereview.appspot.com/5504106/diff/11013/lily/grob.cc
File lily/grob.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5504106/diff/11013/lily/grob.cc#newcode177
lily/grob.cc:177: SCM expr = scm_list_3 (ly_symbol2scm ("id"),
On 2012
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
Run regression tests for lilypond-book (issue 2223).
Re-enable running the regtests in input/regression/lilypond-book.
Fix various typos, clarify what each input file tests for and
how the output should look, and fix the following problems:
col
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5562043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Dear Xavier,
hereby i'd like to thank you for your time spent on helping LilyPond!
It's true that user's work often is not appreciated enough.
2012/1/23 Xavier Scheuer :
> Dear Graham, dear Developers,
> why I never *demand*
> developers to fix an issue, even if it is one that is really annoying
Looks good! Much more user-understandable than anything I could have
ever come up with :)
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569050/diff/1/Docume
Reviewers: MikeSol,
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode3714
Documentation/nota
