Re: Don't let dots go negative in scaleDurations -- Fix Issue 2048 (issue 5437059)

passes make one reg test shows up http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2048#c5 James http://codereview.appspot.com/5437059/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Better pure heights for slurs (issue 5431065)

passes make - reg test diffs attached here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2051#c4 James http://codereview.appspot.com/5431065/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond

Re: OT: Vocal music

> I'm working on a book of madrigals right now and some of it is > recorded. The YouTube excerpt has affinities w/ mm. 21-30 of the > attached PDF & audio file (it's an excerpt from the 3rd madrigal in > the book, called "Lucky Wok (star!)"). Your sample sounds really amazing! However, the nota

Re: OT: Vocal music

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:52:26 +0100 (CET), Werner LEMBERG wrote: I'm working on a book of madrigals right now and some of it is recorded. The YouTube excerpt has affinities w/ mm. 21-30 of the attached PDF & audio file (it's an excerpt from the 3rd madrigal in the book, called "Lucky Wok (star!)"

Re: OT: Vocal music

- Original Message - From: To: "Werner LEMBERG" Cc: ; ; ; Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 11:28 AM Subject: Re: OT: Vocal music On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:52:26 +0100 (CET), Werner LEMBERG wrote: I'm working on a book of madrigals right now and some of it is recorded. The YouTube ex

Re: OT: Vocal music

> I'm guessing this was forwarded on from a different conversation. > Any chance of letting others see/hear the work? Oh, it's probably sitting in the mailing list queue because it was a rather large email... Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing lis

Re: OT: Vocal music

> I've attached a couple images of various movements that are already > done to whet your appetite (or to help you lose it depending on > where you stand). I would *love* to see your code! Scores 1 and 3 again look very amazing. Werner ___ lilyp

LSR updates and Issue 1971

I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and fixes Issue 1971. It's a few hundred files. make and make doc are fine after adding it. Should I push to staging or do something like a review - it seems unlikely anyone will have the enthusiasm to review all 300-odd changed f

Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971

On 11/25/11 10:59 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: >I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and fixes >Issue 1971. It's a few hundred files. make and make doc are fine after >adding it. Should I push to staging or do something like a review - it >seems unlikely anyone will have

Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971

- Original Message - From: "Carl Sorensen" To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel" Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 6:35 PM Subject: Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971 On 11/25/11 10:59 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and fixes Issue 1971.

Re: 2 pushes to dev/staging

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:09:14AM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > Could someone please verify that they are indeed in staging > (111f4707f90a4512f2c945ee5a47510c210b45f9 and > 006a7e62037188718465427626174af5b6f03a1d)? I see that this is resolved now, and hopefully in a few days I'll get in

Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971

On 11/25/11 11:46 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Carl Sorensen" >To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel" >Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 6:35 PM >Subject: Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971 > > >> >> >> On 11/25/11 10:59 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: >> >>>I've got a large patch

Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:59:04PM -, Phil Holmes wrote: > I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and > fixes Issue 1971. It's a few hundred files. make and make doc are > fine after adding it. Should I push to staging or do something like > a review - it seems unlikel

Re: Asserts that footnotes are being numbered correctly. (issue 5433065)

Passes make and make check James http://codereview.appspot.com/5433065/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Uses the pure-from-neighbor-interface for NonMusicalPaperColumn horizontal spacing. (issue 5432070)

Passes Make, all reg test diffs here http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2053#c1 James http://codereview.appspot.com/5432070/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Uses the pure-from-neighbor-interface for NonMusicalPaperColumn horizontal spacing. (issue 5432070)

On 2011/11/25 05:31:57, MikeSol wrote: Sorry, forgot to mention that for the time being this only applies cleanly to the staging branch. It'll apply cleanly to master once master is fast-forwarded. I fast forwarded staging ;) http://codereview.appspot.com/5432070/ _

Re: Better pure heights for slurs (issue 5431065)

Passes Make and reg tests are here http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2051#c6 james http://codereview.appspot.com/5431065/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Make 2-argument form of \accidentalStyle (issue 5432077)

Passes Make and make check James http://codereview.appspot.com/5432077/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Segfaults involving fret diagrams

David, There have been a number of crashes involving fret diagrams when used in lilypond book and multiple runs, for example and With Mike's recent discovery that non-documented pro

Re: Uses the pure-from-neighbor-interface for NonMusicalPaperColumn horizontal spacing. (issue 5432070)

looks good to me, after putting back skyline-vertical-padding for just one more round. http://codereview.appspot.com/5432070/diff/1/input/regression/lyrics-pass-under-bar.ly File input/regression/lyrics-pass-under-bar.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5432070/diff/1/input/regression/ly

Fix issue 1900 -- multiple fret-diagram-terse markups commands crash (issue 5432081)

Reviewers: , Message: I've created a patch for Issue 1900. It solves the crash, but perhaps in a non-optimal way. David, will you please review this, since I've changed code that you added to scm/fret-diagrams.scm? Thanks, Carl Description: Fix issue 1900 -- multiple fret-diagram-terse mark

Re: Better pure heights for slurs (issue 5431065)

On 2011/11/25 05:01:39, mike_apollinemike.com wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:16:46 +, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > I like the direction of this change. Does it actually work? It used to. You should try your patches, occasionally. Take Carl's example from

Re: Better pure heights for slurs (issue 5431065)

On 2011/11/26 01:42:33, Keith wrote: On 2011/11/25 05:01:39, http://mike_apollinemike.com wrote: > > Does it actually work? It used to. I take that back. The override you emailed a while back setting pure-height = 0 worked great, but none of these patches help much. The patch based on my

Re: Better pure heights for slurs (issue 5431065)

On 2011/11/26 01:42:33, Keith wrote: On 2011/11/25 05:01:39, http://mike_apollinemike.com wrote: > > Does it actually work? It used to. I take that back. The override you emailed a while back setting pure-height = 0 worked great, but none of these patches help much. The patch based on my

Re: Better pure heights for slurs (issue 5431065)

On 2011/11/26 02:09:57, Keith wrote: Maybe the *0.5 was converting half-staff-spaces to staff-spaces No; the units are fine. The problem seems to be not so much the overestimate of the slur extent, but that said overestimate of space is allowed before each each script with avoid-slur 'outside :

Re: Segfaults involving fret diagrams

Carl Sorensen writes: > David, > > There have been a number of crashes involving fret diagrams when used in > lilypond book and multiple runs, for example > > and > > > With Mike's

Re: Fix issue 1900 -- multiple fret-diagram-terse markups commands crash (issue 5432081)

carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes: > Reviewers: , > > Message: > I've created a patch for Issue 1900. It solves the crash, but perhaps > in a non-optimal way. > > David, will you please review this, since I've changed code that you > added to scm/fret-diagrams.scm? You are saying that the copying

Re: Fix issue 1900 -- multiple fret-diagram-terse markups commands crash (issue 5432081)

David Kastrup writes: > carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes: > >> Reviewers: , >> >> Message: >> I've created a patch for Issue 1900. It solves the crash, but perhaps >> in a non-optimal way. >> >> David, will you please review this, since I've changed code that you >> added to scm/fret-diagrams.sc

Re: Fix issue 1900 -- multiple fret-diagram-terse markups commands crash (issue 5432081)

On 2011/11/26 06:39:45, dak wrote: Does not look removed. I might have just discussed this step in the mailing list. Reviewing it right now. The functionality seems to be there just fine. What makes you suspect that this copying-of-properties-at-definition-and-documentation-time is responsi