On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 05:26:49PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > I do not think that this is an appropriate time to discuss changes
> > to the bug squad policies, nor to our regtest organization.
> > Please add an item to the GOP policy list about this, and we will
>
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 05:26:49PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > I do not think that this is an appropriate time to discuss changes
>> > to the bug squad policies, nor to our regtest organization.
>> > Please add an item to the GOP poli
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:23:25AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> I won't add any such an item to the GOP policy list since I won't
> endorse announcing one thing in CG while adhering to a different policy
> in reality.
Ok, I added it myself:
86fa50596945324d6b5ab95f8fb018ab69a4e633
Cheers,
- Grah
Am 11.04.2011 03:32, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:57:30PM +, James Lowe wrote:
This one is missing (I think).
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-04/msg00121.html
This was the one sent by Mark Hohl to Carl, but I didn't see
anything done
Thanks add
Am 11.04.2011 06:43, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Marc Hohl has prepared a patch for mandolin predefined fretboards.
The patch looks good to me.
Please review.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4384055/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itel
I've generalized the (print-foo ...) functions as (print-line ...), and
indented with lispindent.lisp.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4373046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Apr 10, 2011, at 9:56 PM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
> Instead of adding a property, is there a way to just make the default
> value of the property be staff_space?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4385053/
The issue with this is that it'd kick all church rest
Hi Bertrand,
There was a discussion last year about dynamics in polyphony which you
might find interesting:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-09/msg00253.html
I'm afraid I agree with Trevor's reply in that thread.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/4387046/
___
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I was able to figure out a way to do this w/o an extra offset (I think).
Please, read, test, & report back.
Cheers,
MS
Description:
Changes the Y offset callback of multi-measure rest.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4389047/
Affected files:
A inpu
On 2011/04/10 05:38:50, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM
Doesn't this require a regtest?
V.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4384050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Works well for me.
There is already a regtest 'accidental-clef-change.ly' that you could
just update. Instead of
texidoc = "Accidentals are reset for clef changes.", we want
texidoc = "Accidentals are repeated after clef changes."
You could put a c-natural in the final chord, and a key signature
> \ No newline at end of file
You should adjust your editor's text mode to automatically insert a
newline at the end of the file if it isn't present yet... IIRC, I've
seen this diff message a few times already in your patches. :-)
Werner
___
lil
On 11-04-11 05:11 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I was able to figure out a way to do this w/o an extra offset (I think).
Please, read, test, & report back.
Cheers,
MS
Mike, is this a new patch against issue 1604? If at all possible, it
helps uneducated bug squad folk a
On 11-04-11 05:11 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I was able to figure out a way to do this w/o an extra offset (I think).
Please, read, test, & report back.
Cheers,
MS
Description:
Changes the Y offset callback of multi-measure rest.
Please review this at http://codereview
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Valentin Villenave, Keith,
Message:
On 2011/04/11 22:40:15, Valentin Villenave wrote:
Doesn't this require a regtest?
The original bug report
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1471> has a test
file. Adding the regtest together with the bug fix mak
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:03:11AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> I have been
> told that the policy documented in the contributor's guide regarding
> regtests is different from the actual policy to be used,
Merry christmas.
5ad4b3a291571e83bcf402656d346e46d8d9e667
> This does not make any sense to
16 matches
Mail list logo
