>> I've attached fontforge images of two broken glyphs;
BTW, this mail sits in the mailing list queue since the images are
rather large...
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon
Hi Graham,
Il giorno gio, 14/10/2010 alle 20.24 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> The best long-term option is to use a later version of gettext. The
> safest+laziest short-term solution is to get a
> libgnugetops-1.3.tar.bz2 that somebody downloaded as part of GUB
> within the past, oh, 6 mont
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Looks good to me. I'll confirm when the GUB
> 2.13.33 for Windows is available.
Greetings Trevor,
sorry for bumping this discussion, but: where are we wrt this problem?
Do we need to open a tracker page about it?
http://lists.gnu.org/arch
Besides the niptick, it looks good to me. I tested by building both
offline and online targets.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2520041/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py
File python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2520041/diff/1/python/auxiliar/postpr
LGTM, and compiles cleanly from scratch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2505041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Valentin Villenave wrote Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:57 PM
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
Looks good to me. I'll confirm when the GUB
2.13.33 for Windows is available.
sorry for bumping this discussion, but: where are we wrt this
problem?
Whoops, sorry, I forgot to
On 2010/10/17 16:52:03, John Mandereau wrote:
python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py:357: extra_depth = '../'
'../' is is not needed for translations, as output web pages are at
the same
depth as the pages in English, and may cause errors in case server
configuration
doesn't redirect /.. to /. I
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 18.28 +, percival.music...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
> On 2010/10/17 16:52:03, John Mandereau wrote:
> > python/auxiliar/postprocess_html.py:357: extra_depth = '../'
> > '../' is is not needed for translations, as output web pages are at
> the same
> > depth as the pa
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 21.22 +0200, John Mandereau ha scritto:
> BTW it should also be
> "manuals.it.html", not "development...". I'm commenting this in on
> Rietveld.
Please ignore this, I just didn't know what I wrote at that moment.
Sorry :-P
John
signature.asc
Description: This i
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:22 PM, John Mandereau
wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 18.28 +, percival.music...@gmail.com
> ha scritto:
>> Are you sure about that? After disabling the
>> (make the "return to doc index" work) stuff
>
> Do you mean your patch?
I mean, change line 349:
-
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> No need now.
Very well then, thanks for the follow-up!
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 20.38 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> The extra "../" is present in the docs, in the output of
> postprocess.html, if no attempt is made to rewrite the "return to doc
> index". I don't know if these exist in the docs previously (I suspect
> this is the case, tho
Here's another version. Note that the "extra depth" thing is now added
to the *non*-translated version.
I have no clue why. I've spent 3 hours bashing against the build
process, and that's enough for me.
CG 5.3 Debugging website and docs locally
has what I know about trying to solve this stuf
On 2010/10/17 21:14:11, Graham Percival wrote:
Here's another version. Note that the "extra depth" thing is now
added to the
*non*-translated version.
I have no clue why. I've spent 3 hours bashing against the build
process, and
that's enough for me.
CG 5.3 Debugging website and docs
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:40:05PM +, john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2010/10/17 21:14:11, Graham Percival wrote:
> >Along the way, I've found that firefox is profoundly unhappy with
> "..//..".
> >That may have prompted me to add the extra ../ to translations
> initially. Or
> >maybe the
But, it breaks all my scores! Those which use the old names, I mean.
On 10-10-17 01:20 PM, percival.music...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM, and compiles cleanly from scratch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2505041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 06:57:15PM -0400, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> But, it breaks all my scores! Those which use the old names, I mean.
Learn how to use convert-ly.
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/
Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 23.45 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> Eh? The patch only does stuff for the online target. That's what
> line 349 is supposed to do:
> if target == 'online':
Indeed, I'm really puzzled. I'm sure I looked at offline docs with your
second patch, but
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:21:09AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 17/10/2010 alle 23.45 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > If the patch breaks offline docs, then something is /really/
> > messed up. Did my 819365f311a832c5cc57f086016069efdbee91fa break
> > the offline docs?
>
>
Hello,
Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon, and I'm trying to
figure out what to do with regard to LilyPond's build system. I don't
know if Arch Linux is the first distribution upgrading to Python 3,
but this migration will be happening any day now.
The distribution-wide policy is
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 05:38:20PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> --) Two scripts still have "/usr/bin/python" lines
> (python/auxiliar/manuals_definitions.py, and scripts/build/pytt.py).
> Those should be changed to "@PYTHON@", right?
python/ yes, since it's not something that people call manual
Patrick McCarty gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon,
What does this mean? "$ python" will give Python 3?
If so, that's no good. "python3" is supposed to be the name of the Python 3
executable for time in memoriam.
>
> The distribution-wide po
Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes:
> time in memoriam.
Hmm, that is a curious think-o. I meant "time immemorial" of course.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Patrick McCarty gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Arch Linux will be migrating to Python 3 very soon,
>
> What does this mean? "$ python" will give Python 3?
Yes.
> If so, that's no good. "python3" is supposed to be the name of the Python 3
> e
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Huh. I've been following the Arch Linux development list
> for a while, but it didn't occur to me that they were
> doing something radically different than the recommended
> policy.
>
> This is the procedure they are following, and I think they
> are nearly finished with t
25 matches
Mail list logo
