I realize that downloading and reading the documentation offline is
not for everyone, but is there a way to make a documentation for
download that isn't so large? Looking at it, the size increased more
than 30 MB between 2.13.1 and 2.13.2. I don't know usually work with
the unstable docs, b
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, James Bailey wrote:
I realize that downloading and reading the documentation offline is not for
everyone, but is there a way to make a documentation for download that isn't
so large? Looking at it, the size increased more than 30 MB between 2.13.1
and 2.13.2. I don't kno
Am Samstag, 24. April 2010 11:50:20 schrieben Sie:
> Hi Reinhold, Graham,
>
> 2010/4/23 Graham Percival :
> > As far as I'm concerned, yes. Maybe wait 24 hours in case anybody
> > objects? But then go ahead.
> >
> > For anybody skimming this: the patch includes a convert-ly rule
> > which chang
Thanks for this very useful reply.
2010/4/25 Reinhold Kainhofer :
>
> [...]
>
> You can continue using that definition, of course.
>
> However, your approach has the problem(s) that (1) it only creates
> something that looks like a crescendo, but lilypond does not know
> this internally, so (2) M
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:41:30AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, James Bailey wrote:
>
>> I realize that downloading and reading the documentation offline is not
>> for everyone, but is there a way to make a documentation for download
>> that isn't so large?
Download i
David Kastrup writes:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:10:15AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/20/10 7:57 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>>>
>>> > Once it *is* tested, does anybody know how to apply the
>>> > patch? I see a "download raw patch set", but we sho
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> So what's up with the patch series?
Sorry, it was still sitting in my "most urgent" mail folder. I'm
testing "make" right now; should start a "make doc" in 5 minutes, and
will push as soon as that's finished provided that there's no probl
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> So what's up with the patch series?
>
> Sorry, it was still sitting in my "most urgent" mail folder.
Pushed now as d43f0a2575409659fbdd21b9b17b5f8440cc7268. I even
managed to re
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Inside the #{ ... #} construct, you have to use #$variable
> where a scheme token is required, but you use $variable
> where \variable could be used. Behind the scenes,
> $variable is actually replaced by something like \tmpvar
> before being parsed.
Can you provide an exa
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> So what's up with the patch series?
>>
>> Sorry, it was still sitting in my "most urgent" mail folder.
>
> Pushed now as d43f0a2575409659fbdd21b9b
Here's a patch to reorganize the music functions material in
Notation and Extending. This also includes (finally) some
code to auto-document the available type predicates in
type-p-name-alist.
Before I finish the re-editing, however, I'd like to see how
this question gets answered:
http://lists.g
On 4/25/10 7:34 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> Here's a patch to reorganize the music functions material in
> Notation and Extending. This also includes (finally) some
> code to auto-document the available type predicates in
> type-p-name-alist.
>
> Before I finish the re-editing, however, I'd
On 4/25/10 11:51 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
>> Inside the #{ ... #} construct, you have to use #$variable
>> where a scheme token is required, but you use $variable
>> where \variable could be used. Behind the scenes,
>> $variable is actually replaced by something like
Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> Here's a patch to reorganize the music functions [...]
>
> Can you post it on Rietveld? It's much easier to review
> there.
Sure. I accidentally left out a file in the previous patch
anyway. Here it is on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/970044
- Mark
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> As I understand it, in LilyPond input, the # is a token
> that indicates a Scheme expression follows.
>
> In a #{ #} expression, $ is a token that indicates a
> Scheme expression to be evaluated follows.
And all this time I thought $ was only for referencing the
function's a
The implicit initial duration of a { music } block is 4
(quarter note), unless that block is preceded by a block
which ends with a different duration, even if the preceding
music block is within another \book scope included from a
different file! The docs don't do a good job of addressing
this, an
16 matches
Mail list logo
