I just noticed that the "segno" bars aren't displaying
properly here:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/bars.html
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:51:59AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I just noticed that the "segno" bars aren't displaying
> properly here:
If those involve changes to the font, then kainhofer won't pick
them up automatically.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypon
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> I just send the patch once more as a remainder to shorten the example
> without losing information.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lis
alternate title:
On the Road to 2.14: let's get this done.
Neil has been steadily working away at regressions, which is
fantastic, but I'm hoping to spur things along. There 8
code-related Critical issues. Let's do one each week. Everybody
jumpes onto the bug. Make wild suggestions. Brainst
James Lowe wrote:
> @item
> @code{@@u...@{@var{URL}[, @var{link tex...@}} --- link to an
> -external url.
> +external url. Use within an @code{@@example ... @@end example}.
> +
> +...@example
> +@@example
> +@@u...@{url [, link text ]...@}
> +@@end example
> +...@end example
> @end itemize
Gra
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:42:27PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> James Lowe wrote:
> > +...@example
> > +@@example
> > +@@u...@{url [, link text ]...@}
> > +@@end example
> > +...@end example
> > @end itemize
>
> Is this a new doc policy?
Umm. Kind-of.
> I seem to have missed the discussion. A
We'll have another LilyPond report in two weeks. If you want to
add anything, or make sure that we mention anything (such as Frog
work), get in touch.
- somebody could have fun generating some particularly relevant
graphs from the new git repo?
- somebody could review that iphone lilypond-using
Hello
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: Thu 15/04/2010 0:30
...somebody
should change the link to the lilypond Report ASAP.
(news.lilynet.net looks like a nice official website, so this both
adds more credence to the report, and makes it vis
Graham Percival wrote:
> How about "if it is important to let people follow the
> link, put it inside an @example" ? The idea is to make
> sure that people who print the PDFs can see stuff. If
> it's not too much bother.
It seems to me that there are two unrelated issues that
you've squeezed int