Re: weblily: security risk

Hi Graham, thank your for sharing your thoughts about weblily.net. Of cource, security is a concern I have on my mind and I'd be happy to get into discussion with you and other knowledgable people on security issues. And I will do my very best notto fall prey to all those evil people out ther

Re: weblily: security risk

Note that there are existing effort on creating a service that can be used to render lilypond scores in Google Wave or in any web application. You can get its code at http://code.google.com/p/lilypondy/source/browse/#svn/trunk/lilywaveservlet You can see so

Re: weblily: security risk

I have poked around a bit, and could not find obvious holes, but you are exposing the unix system, so it is a bit scary. For example, if there are local exploits in the kernel, this system makes it a remote explote for weblily,and the fact that uname is available (telling me you are on 2.6.31.ec2.

[PATCH] Build: require all glyphs for `font-table.ly'.

If a developer adds new glyphs to `mf/feta-noteheads.mf' but doesn't document them in `Documentation/included/font-table.ly', I'd like `make doc' to fail with some message like: Unlisted glyphs in Documentation/included/font-table.ly: (noteheads.s2foo noteheads.s2bar) I've attached a patch attemp

Re: [PATCH] Build: require all glyphs for `font-table.ly'.

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > there a simpler way of doing this: > (if (not (null? lst)) ...) You may want to define it as a function: http://repo.or.cz/w/orchestrallily.git/blob/HEAD:/orchestrallily.ily#l46 Cheers, Valentin ___

Re: [PATCH] Build: require all glyphs for `font-table.ly'.

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > If a developer adds new glyphs to `mf/feta-noteheads.mf' > but doesn't document them in > `Documentation/included/font-table.ly', I'd like `make doc' > to fail with some message like: > > Unlisted glyphs in Documentation/included/font-table.ly

Re: [PATCH] Build: require all glyphs for `font-table.ly'.

I considerably reworked the patch. Okay to push? - Mark From 5f382735bd40611a6f659fd9fc0529a51a047ac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Polesky Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:54:30 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Build: require all glyphs for `font-table.ly'. * Any new glyph whose font-table catego