Re: CG addition about Git pulling

2010-01-05 Thread Mark Polesky
Graham Percival wrote: > Could we get the new introduction chapter added?  I've > been wanting to add the info about lilypond mentors for a > while, but I don't want to add a new chapter filled with > stubs if you're going to add the same new chapter filled > with real sections. For the moment I'm

openSUSE Lilypond now building documentation

2010-01-05 Thread Dave Plater
Hi, maintainer of lilypond for openSUSE and I'm now building the documentation and have restored most of the original spec file. I would appreciate somebody knowledgeable looking over the spec file at :- http://pastebin.com/m3d9ed2aa I would especially like somebody to scan the files section to see

Re: CG addition about Git pulling

2010-01-05 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:21 AM Graham Percival wrote: I think everybody liked the idea of the intro chapter, even if there's slight uncertainty over one section of it (i.e. lily-git). Let's get the part(s) that everybody agrees with done. Okay, I've attached a patch th

Re: CG addition about Git pulling

2010-01-05 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:21:06AM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > I think everybody liked the idea of the intro chapter, > > even if there's slight uncertainty over one section of it > > (i.e.  lily-git).  Let's get the part(s) that everybody > > agrees with done. > > Okay

Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond

2010-01-05 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 11:38 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave Plater: [keeping cc on list] > On 01/05/2010 11:12 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 07:52 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave > > Plater: > > see the attached lily-65a7b1b1-1.eps; however it seems that curr

Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond

2010-01-05 Thread Dave Plater
On 01/05/2010 03:16 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 11:38 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave > Plater: > > [keeping cc on list] > > >> On 01/05/2010 11:12 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> >>> Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 07:52 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave >>> Plater

Interrupted builds: gs should remove broken output? [Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond]

2010-01-05 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 16:00 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave Plater: > On 01/05/2010 03:16 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Op dinsdag 05-01-2010 om 11:38 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave > > Plater: > "/usr/src/packages/BUILD/lilypond-2.12.3/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--7471402555679770406

Re: [tablatures] bends: pre-implementation issues

2010-01-05 Thread Marc Hohl
Patrick Horgan schrieb: Marc Hohl wrote: Hello all, I plan to work on the emplementation of bends for lilypond. Some preliminary tests with scheme were successful, so I want to go to the next stage soon and create some new engravers. But there are still some unsolved issues. But first, a br

Re: bends: pre-implementation issues

2010-01-05 Thread Marc Hohl
Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: I am confused here. Are you trying to implement the symbols that are on the tab staff, or on the normal notation? Both. But first, I want to concentrate on the pointed slurs in the normal notation, make that the default for normal staves *and* tablature and then (as

Re: [tablatures] Re: bends: pre-implementation issues

2010-01-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/5/10 12:36 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: >> I am confused here. Are you trying to implement the symbols that are >> on the tab staff, or on the normal notation? >> > Both. But first, I want to concentrate on the pointed slurs in the > normal notation, > make that t

Re: bends: pre-implementation issues

2010-01-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Marc Hohl wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: >> >> I am confused here.  Are you trying to implement the symbols that are >> on the tab staff, or on the normal notation? >> > > Both. But first, I want to concentrate on the pointed slurs in the normal > notation, > ma

Re: CG addition about Git pulling

2010-01-05 Thread Mark Polesky
Trevor Daniels wrote: > The section headings need to make it clearer what audience > is being addressed. Perhaps > > Summary for experienced Unix developers > Full details for new contributors > > Then of course there is a lot more to add to provide "full > details". But that can come later. Wel