Carl Sorensen writes:
> Then, if desired, the user can change the values of beatLength,
> measureGrouping, or autoBeamRules, they can do so directly by means of
> the \set command.
>
> If a user wants to change the timeSignatureSettings values for beatLength,
> measureGrouping, or autoBeamRules,
Hi Carl
This looks like a much better approach. It means the
special \overrideTimeSignatureSettings will be required
only rarely, and setting autoBeamRules for just the
current time signature should have a much simpler
format as the time signature is known - is that right?
Trevor
- Origina
Mark Polesky schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote:
By the way, it would be easier for you developers when the
patches go directly to rietveld. How can I archieve this?
Does somebody need to create an account for me?
See CG "Adding or modifying features"; scroll down to
8.7.9 "Post patch for commen
On 12/29/09 4:48 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> Hi Carl
>
> This looks like a much better approach. It means the
> special \overrideTimeSignatureSettings will be required
> only rarely, and setting autoBeamRules for just the
> current time signature should have a much simpler
> format as the
On 12/29/09 1:40 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> Then, if desired, the user can change the values of beatLength,
>> measureGrouping, or autoBeamRules, they can do so directly by means of
>> the \set command.
>>
>> If a user wants to change the timeSignatureSettings v
On 12/29/09 8:41 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 12/29/09 4:48 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>> Hi Carl
>>
>> This looks like a much better approach. It means the
>> special \overrideTimeSignatureSettings will be required
>> only rarely, and setting autoBeamRules for just the
>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:16:37AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > - find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -delete
> > + find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l | xargs rm -f
> > endif # ifeq ($(out),www)
>
> What's the rationale?
The `-delete' primary isn't very portable, it's a GNU extension.
On 29 Dec 2009, at 03:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Does this seem like a feasible architecture?
I think a system that determines the measure from the time signature
is fundamentally flawed. I think n terms of a \meter that can be used
to define the beaming structure. I substructure of that is
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:46PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:16:37AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > - find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -delete
> > > + find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l | xargs rm -f
> > > endif # ifeq ($(out),www)
> >
> > What's the ration
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Francisco Vila schrieb:
Just to add a bit to the brainstorming:
The uppermost lace of our G-clef already was slightly oversized.
I cannot explain why, but latest proposals I've seen are getting it
even greater.
Anyone appreciates the same?
Well spotted. I was not sure wh
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 à 20:19 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:46PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > The `-delete' primary isn't very portable, it's a GNU extension.
>
> IMHO, that's all we need to hear. -delete must be removed.
Yes, that's what I figured ou
On 12/29/09 12:31 PM, "Hans Aberg" wrote:
> On 29 Dec 2009, at 03:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Does this seem like a feasible architecture?
>
> I think a system that determines the measure from the time signature
> is fundamentally flawed. I think n terms of a \meter that can be used
> to d
[this is becoming slightly offtopic, but anyway...]
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:19:57PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > > - find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -delete
> > > > + find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l | xargs rm -f
[...]
> > The `-delete' primary isn't very portable, it
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 11:27 -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/29/09 8:41 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/29/09 4:48 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Carl
> >>
> >> This looks like a much better approach. It means the
> >> special \overrideTimeSignatur
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 à 22:05 +0100, Matthias Kilian a écrit :
> `must' is such a strong word. There are other GNUisms (or non-portable
> extensions) hidden in the build system, like that `grep -L' at some
> places.
This will disappear in some future (when Texinfo has a good enough i18n
suppor
On 29 Dec 2009, at 22:00, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Does this seem like a feasible architecture?
I think a system that determines the [meter] from the time signature
is fundamentally flawed. I think in terms of a \meter that can be
used
to define the beaming structure. I substructure of that is
On 12/29/09 2:14 PM, "Joe Neeman" wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 11:27 -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/29/09 8:41 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/29/09 4:48 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>>>
Hi Carl
This looks like a much better approa
On 12/29/09 3:06 PM, "Hans Aberg" wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Dec 2009, at 22:00, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
Does this seem like a feasible architecture?
>>>
>>> I think a system that determines the [meter] from the time signature
>>> is fundamentally flawed. I think in terms of a \meter that can
2009/12/29 Marc Hohl :
> I concatenated the pdfs to one file, which is too big for the list, so I
> put it on my website:
>
> http://www.hohlart.de/marc/gclef-slant.pdf
>
> I know that there is a spurious error on value 2, but I think that's not the
> main problem. Which value looks best?
At a ris
On 12/29/09 1:54 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Marc Hohl schrieb:
>> Francisco Vila schrieb:
>>> Just to add a bit to the brainstorming:
>>>
>>> The uppermost lace of our G-clef already was slightly oversized.
>>> I cannot explain why, but latest proposals I've seen are getting it
>>> even greater
The Frogs have been around for a year, and I recently got two new doc
contributors, so I've been thinking about how things have been going
and some of the problems we've had. I'm thinking about proposing a
(semi-?)formal system of mentors.
One thing I learned from GDP was that things work better
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> The below patch stops texi2html from creating two anchors, making the
> webpage navigation much more comfortable. However, it also makes the
> TOC navbars disappear.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init
> b/Documentation
The documentation is broken right now due to the french translation of the
Notation reference.
A bad index entry is found in Documentation/fr/out-www/notation.cp
Line 2 in this file is:
\entry{\par }{1}{\code {\par }}
In the corresponding file Documentation/out-www/notation.cp, line 2 is
\ent
Oops, relied off-list by accident.
Please do a new pull, and build from a fresh tree. This mess was
fixed in 7b34eac90f81c8123feaf2670fafae236101f14c and I can confirm
that it's ok in 80ebf95c872dd6afd587ce388e7fa3ca216937aa .
I don't know if the "make clean" is strictly necessary, but it can't
On 12/29/09 9:32 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> Oops, relied off-list by accident.
>
> Please do a new pull, and build from a fresh tree. This mess was
> fixed in 7b34eac90f81c8123feaf2670fafae236101f14c and I can confirm
> that it's ok in 80ebf95c872dd6afd587ce388e7fa3ca216937aa .
>
> I do
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> So now make fails, with this error message:
Interesting. When was the last time you did a fresh "make" ? Was it
before 21 Dec 2009 ?
> ./include/libc-extension.hh:51: error: declaration does not declare anything
> ./include/libc-extensi
Folks,
why can I say
\new PianoStaff \with {
\override StaffGrouper
#'between-staff-spacing #'minimum-distance = #20
} ...
but not
\new Staff \with {
\override VerticalAxisGroup
#'next-staff-spacing #'minimum-distance = #20
} ...
?
The latter gives this warning:
On 2009-12-29, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > The below patch stops texi2html from creating two anchors, making the
> > webpage navigation much more comfortable. However, it also makes the
> > TOC navbars disappear.
> >
> > diff --git a/Docu
On 2009-12-29, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> After an hour digging through the texi2html source, I was not able to
> figure it out, so I'll come back this issue in a couple of days.
>
> Though, as an experiment, I tried nulling the first return value
> instead of the second, and the second-layer TOC
file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.13.10/Documentation/hu/web.texi
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.13.10/Documentation/hu/web/download.itexi
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.13.10/Documentation/hu/web/introduction.itexi
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.13.10/Documenta
Graham Percival writes:
>> Then change it to something like this:
>>
>> find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -print0 | xargs -0 rm -f --
>>
>> Or even this (completely POSIX compliant):
>>
>> find $(outdir)/offline-root -type -l -exec rm -f -- '{}' +
>>
>> (but then I've to patch it
Matthias Kilian writes:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:16:37AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> > - find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l -delete
>> > + find $(outdir)/offline-root -type l | xargs rm -f
>> > endif # ifeq ($(out),www)
>>
>> What's the rationale?
>
> The `-delete' primary isn't very
32 matches
Mail list logo
