Thanks to Neil, TextSpanner items are now displayed in `Dynamics'
contexts. However, this exhibits another serious annoyance, as shown
in bug issue #928.
This time, I've tagged my bug report with `medium'...
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing li
John Mandereau wrote 10 Dec 2009
Trevor Daniels wrote 9 Dec2009
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/trevor/lilypond-git/scripts/build/out/www_post",
line 67,
in
map (os.mkdir, [os.path.join (out_root, d) for d in dirs])
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'out-www
Doing an out-of-tree build:
mkdir ../lily-out
make distclean
cd ../lily-out
../lilypond/configure
make
make doc
produces a 0-byte contributor.xref-map and
AAA-intro-reression.xref-map. It looks fine for INTALL, internals,
snippets, usage, and web. (I'm surprised that it worked for we
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:59:09PM +, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/trevor/lilypond-git/scripts/build/out/www_post",
line 67,
in
map (os.mkdir, [os.path.join (out_root, d) for d in di
Le vendredi 11 décembre 2009 à 09:10 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Doing an out-of-tree build:
> mkdir ../lily-out
> make distclean
> cd ../lily-out
> ../lilypond/configure
> make
> make doc
>
> produces a 0-byte contributor.xref-map
I guess the problem might come from the lack o
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:52:03PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > It was added as a short-cut hack for
> > << c1 {s4\< s s\> s\!} >>
>
> So then I assume you're okay with me de-quantizing the
> espressivo as well.
I have no objection to this. I confess that my vague re
Le vendredi 11 décembre 2009 à 08:39 +, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> John, many thanks for your reply, but thankfully the problem
> appears to have gone away.
>
> I modified www_post.py as you suggested, and then made a
> clean start by running ./autogen.sh, make doc-clean and then
> make doc in
> Have you tried the suggested fix from the second thread?
>
> Something like
>
> sed -i 's|__vector|lily_vector|g' flower/include/std-vector.hh
>
> might be worth a try.
>
> Regards,
> Neil
You are right, according to
http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg29281.htm
2.13.9 has been uploaded and should be visible now. Could people
give it a quick spin?
NB: it is not visible on the main "download" page; you need to go
directly to the "download site" link under "ancient versions".
Alternately, go to the 2.13 docs -> (web) Community -> Download.
Those links work
Hi Neil,
n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ian,
LGTM, apart from some formatting issues and a few incorrect \version
numbers.
Can you sort out the naming of the new regression tests? For
consistency with the existing test, I'd advise amending them as follows:
hara-kiri-drumstaff.ly
hara-kiri-rhy
Le vendredi 11 décembre 2009 à 14:24 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Quick poll: I promised to announce 2.13.9 on the info list (after
> waiting 12-24 hours for tests to avoid any huge embarassment), but
> it seems that the website still only displays 2.13.7. Who thinks
> I should announce 2.13
I've just posted patch set 3 to Reitveld, after quite
some struggles with juggling regression-testing and
doc-building in a too-small virtual ubuntu system.
See http://codereview.appspot.com/164063
The main change from patch set 2 is to generalise the
input format of the context property fretLab
Graham Percival wrote Friday, December 11, 2009 2:24 PM
2.13.9 has been uploaded and should be visible now. Could people
give it a quick spin?
Downloaded mingw and installed fine in Vista.
Tested lilypond-book and lily by compiling notation/pitches.itely -
fine
convert-ly - fine
Dropped a
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> Quick poll: I promised to announce 2.13.9 on the info list (after
> waiting 12-24 hours for tests to avoid any huge embarassment), but
> it seems that the website still only displays 2.13.7. Who thinks
> I should announce 2.13.9 with the
Le vendredi 11 décembre 2009 à 13:35 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> Do we know what's wrong with the website? Is this something I can help fix?
No, as my previous reply probably shows, only somebody with a login on
lilypond.org (and possibly privileges to update the makefiles and
scripts in t
Thank you for filing that bug issue! How are things progressing? Also,
can I make a $100 donation in gratitude to the person implementing the
fix? Who is the responsible party to send the money to?
Ted
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:14:43PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ted Walther wrote:
> Thank you for filing that bug issue! How are things progressing? Also,
> can I make a $100 donation in gratitude to the person implementing the
> fix? Who is the responsible party to send the money to?
I've added your bounty offer on the t
2009/12/11 Mark Polesky :
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> It was added as a short-cut hack for
>> << c1 {s4\< s s\> s\!} >>
>
> So then I assume you're okay with me de-quantizing the
> espressivo as well. Is the attached patch okay to apply,
LGTM.
> do I need to do anything described in CG 8.7 "Ad
Hi,
I've implemented Neil's comments, re-run regression tests locally and
uploaded amended patches to Rietveld.
I think this should be ready to push now.
Cheers,
Ian
http://codereview.appspot.com/165096/diff/1/2
File input/regression/hara-kiri-drums.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ted Walther wrote:
>> Thank you for filing that bug issue! How are things progressing? Also,
>> can I make a $100 donation in gratitude to the person implementing the
>> fix? Who is the responsible p
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:47:47PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, December 11, 2009 2:24 PM
>
>> 2.13.9 has been uploaded and should be visible now. Could people
>> give it a quick spin?
>
> Dropped a couple of files onto desktop icon - not so good
> A log file was
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:35:24PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> >
> > Quick poll: I promised to announce 2.13.9 on the info list (after
> > waiting 12-24 hours for tests to avoid any huge embarassment), but
> > it seems that the websit
With the release of 2.13.9, we now believe that all bugs are
either fixed, or have been added to the issue tracker. If you
have reported a bug and it is not in the tracker, please check the
bug reporting guidelines and re-submit it.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/bug-reports
V
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:02:45PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Are you sure the last change in GNUmakefile has be updated in
> the appropriate trusted-scripts/ directory on lilypond.org?
Updating the GNUmakefile seems to have done it; apparently we
forgot to do this.
> PS: I sent you the Hunga
Just so that people know what's planned...
- another beta for 2.12.3 will happen as soon as I can build the tests
and docs. Jan and I will continue to work on this; hopefully it'll be
out in a few days. This will be the last 2.12 release.
- 2.13.10 will happen fairly soon thereafter; the main go
Could someone please check issue #774 with a stable release (either
2.10 or 2.12) so that I can probably set the regression flag? At the
time of my report, I only had 2.11.13 for comparison, which is a
developer's version, and I still don't have any stable releases
installed.
Werner
_
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 07:00 +, Graham Percival wrote:
> Just so that people know what's planned...
> - another beta for 2.12.3 will happen as soon as I can build the tests
> and docs. Jan and I will continue to work on this; hopefully it'll be
> out in a few days. This will be the last 2.12 r
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Could someone please check issue #774 with a stable release (either
> 2.10 or 2.12) so that I can probably set the regression flag? At the
> time of my report, I only had 2.11.13 for comparison, which is a
> developer's version, and I st
28 matches
Mail list logo
