accent and marcato shouldn't be quantized

2009-12-09 Thread Mark Polesky
Wow.  It's been just over 94 (and a half) *days* since my last transmission here.  If anyone is curious, I am still alive, but have been away from LP for a long time, and I'm finding myself extremely rusty!  If you don't use it, you lose it, I guess...  I'm also fully liberated from Microsoft et

Re: translations in lilypond-texi2html.init

2009-12-09 Thread John Mandereau
Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 05:03 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > Could translations of texi2html stuff be done in a separate file? I'm > sure that perl has some way of reading a {} data type from a file. Texi2HTML implements (or is going to implement very soon) Gettext, so I'm for dealing

Re: [PATCH] Update & announcement

2009-12-09 Thread John Mandereau
Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 01:19 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > Only if you accept responsibility for making it work in makeinfo, > texi2pdf, and texi2html. This duplicates 10 or 20 commands in > macros.itexi. That's one file. When you change a manual name, > you need to update 4 lines o

Re: Cannot make doc

2009-12-09 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 06 décembre 2009 à 19:37 +0100, Francisco Vila a écrit : > I have rm-rf'ed completely out* and Documentation/, then reset them > hard, and still > >*** Can't open ./out-www/learning/ for writing: Is a directory, > > after 41 min of compilation. To investigate this, I need the Git

Re: Cannot make doc

2009-12-09 Thread John Mandereau
Le samedi 05 décembre 2009 à 11:18 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > I've seen similar messages when attempting to build it on GUB, > although they specify /contributor/ instead. Please send me the same info I asked in my reply to Francisco, otherwise there is little chance I see why extract-texi

Re: build specific versions of packages with gub

2009-12-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op woensdag 09-12-2009 om 05:32 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham Percival: > Now, bin/gib has a --branch option, but I can't see anything similar > for bin/gub. Any thoughts? Fixed in master. [really] Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: ht

Re: accent and marcato shouldn't be quantized

2009-12-09 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:05 AM Wow. It's been just over 94 (and a half) *days* since my last transmission here. If > anyone is curious, I am still alive, Hi Mark - good to hear it ;) Which brings me to my question: Currently there are 11 scripts for which 'quan

Build failure on OS X: "error: template class without a name"

2009-12-09 Thread Harmath Dénes
Hi all, As another attempt on building LilyPond on OS X 10.6, I managed to run ./autogen.sh without any errors or warnings. But when running make all, I get the following C++ compilation error: In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/vector:70, from ./include/std-vector.hh

Re: midi elapsed time markers

2009-12-09 Thread demery
> I was thinking of something as simple as using the number of beats > per minute (\tempo ... ) and the the number of beats per bar to work out > the elapsed time. Obviously this gets more complicated when taking > tempo changes into account and any partial bars and repeat sections, which can get

Re: Cannot make doc

2009-12-09 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/12/9 John Mandereau : > Le samedi 05 décembre 2009 à 11:18 +, Graham Percival a écrit : >> I've seen similar messages when attempting to build it on GUB, >> although they specify /contributor/ instead. > > Please send me the same info I asked in my reply to Francisco, otherwise > there is

Can't compile docs

2009-12-09 Thread Trevor Daniels
Due to my ubuntu virtual disk becoming full I had to do a make doc-clean to free up some space; now I can't compile the docs. The last few lines in the console are: echo -e 'AddDefaultCharset utf-8\nAddCharset utf-8 .html\nAddCharset utf-8 .en\nAddCharset utf-8 .nl\nAddCharset utf-8 .txt\n' > /ho

Re: Can't compile docs

2009-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:59:09PM +, Trevor Daniels wrote: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/trevor/lilypond-git/scripts/build/out/www_post", line 67, > in > map (os.mkdir, [os.path.join (out_root, d) for d in dirs]) > OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > 'ou

Re: build specific versions of packages with gub

2009-12-09 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > > [1]  you can test the 2.12.3 packages if you want: > http://lilypond.org/~graham/ Tested mingw with Wine, darwin-x86 and ppc on OSX 10.5, and linux-x86 / linux-64. Everything looks fine. Thanks, Patrick ___

Re: build specific versions of packages with gub

2009-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:32:45PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Graham Percival > wrote: > > > > [1]  you can test the 2.12.3 packages if you want: > > http://lilypond.org/~graham/ > > Tested mingw with Wine, darwin-x86 and ppc on OSX 10.5, and linux-x86 > / lin

Re: Build failure on OS X: "error: template class without a name"

2009-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
Are you using fink? Are you using the standard 10.6 xtools? What version of gcc do they use? Cheers, - Graham On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:57:05PM +0100, Harmath Dénes wrote: > Hi all, > > As another attempt on building LilyPond on OS X 10.6, I managed to run > ./autogen.sh without any errors o

Re: [PATCH] Update & announcement

2009-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:11:20AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 01:19 +, Graham Percival a écrit : > > Only if you accept responsibility for making it work in makeinfo, > > texi2pdf, and texi2html. This duplicates 10 or 20 commands in > > macros.itexi. That's

Re: [PATCH] Update & announcement

2009-12-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 03:44:29AM +, Graham Percival wrote: > If the waf system was working... and it had a good logging > system for the doc-builds, good warnings, etc... In case you're wondering what this means: GUB has an *excellent* logging system. I really want something like that for t

bug rating

2009-12-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Graham, is it correct that all fixes, regardless of its annoyance, get a `low priority' in case it won't become part of the next `milestone' release? I consider this categorization a bit coarse, and I would like to see at least one more level to mark bugs as `annoying' or something like that.