Wow. It's been just over 94 (and a half) *days* since my last transmission
here. If anyone is curious, I am still alive, but have been away from LP for a
long time, and I'm finding myself extremely rusty! If you don't use it, you
lose it, I guess... I'm also fully liberated from Microsoft et
Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 05:03 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Could translations of texi2html stuff be done in a separate file? I'm
> sure that perl has some way of reading a {} data type from a file.
Texi2HTML implements (or is going to implement very soon) Gettext, so
I'm for dealing
Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 01:19 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Only if you accept responsibility for making it work in makeinfo,
> texi2pdf, and texi2html. This duplicates 10 or 20 commands in
> macros.itexi. That's one file. When you change a manual name,
> you need to update 4 lines o
Le dimanche 06 décembre 2009 à 19:37 +0100, Francisco Vila a écrit :
> I have rm-rf'ed completely out* and Documentation/, then reset them
> hard, and still
>
>*** Can't open ./out-www/learning/ for writing: Is a directory,
>
> after 41 min of compilation.
To investigate this, I need the Git
Le samedi 05 décembre 2009 à 11:18 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I've seen similar messages when attempting to build it on GUB,
> although they specify /contributor/ instead.
Please send me the same info I asked in my reply to Francisco, otherwise
there is little chance I see why extract-texi
Op woensdag 09-12-2009 om 05:32 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Now, bin/gib has a --branch option, but I can't see anything similar
> for bin/gub. Any thoughts?
Fixed in master. [really]
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
Avatar®: ht
Mark Polesky wrote Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:05 AM
Wow. It's been just over 94 (and a half) *days* since my last
transmission here. If > anyone is curious, I am still alive,
Hi Mark - good to hear it ;)
Which brings me to my question:
Currently there are 11 scripts for which 'quan
Hi all,
As another attempt on building LilyPond on OS X 10.6, I managed to run
./autogen.sh without any errors or warnings. But when running make all, I get
the following C++ compilation error:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/vector:70,
from ./include/std-vector.hh
> I was thinking of something as simple as using the number of beats
> per minute (\tempo ... ) and the the number of beats per bar to work out
> the elapsed time. Obviously this gets more complicated when taking
> tempo changes into account and any partial bars
and repeat sections, which can get
2009/12/9 John Mandereau :
> Le samedi 05 décembre 2009 à 11:18 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
>> I've seen similar messages when attempting to build it on GUB,
>> although they specify /contributor/ instead.
>
> Please send me the same info I asked in my reply to Francisco, otherwise
> there is
Due to my ubuntu virtual disk becoming full I had to do a make doc-clean
to free up some space; now I can't compile the docs. The last few lines
in the console are:
echo -e 'AddDefaultCharset utf-8\nAddCharset utf-8 .html\nAddCharset
utf-8 .en\nAddCharset utf-8 .nl\nAddCharset utf-8 .txt\n'
> /ho
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:59:09PM +, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/trevor/lilypond-git/scripts/build/out/www_post", line 67,
> in
> map (os.mkdir, [os.path.join (out_root, d) for d in dirs])
> OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> 'ou
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> [1] you can test the 2.12.3 packages if you want:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Tested mingw with Wine, darwin-x86 and ppc on OSX 10.5, and linux-x86
/ linux-64. Everything looks fine.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 06:32:45PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> >
> > [1] you can test the 2.12.3 packages if you want:
> > http://lilypond.org/~graham/
>
> Tested mingw with Wine, darwin-x86 and ppc on OSX 10.5, and linux-x86
> / lin
Are you using fink? Are you using the standard 10.6 xtools? What
version of gcc do they use?
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:57:05PM +0100, Harmath Dénes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As another attempt on building LilyPond on OS X 10.6, I managed to run
> ./autogen.sh without any errors o
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:11:20AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 décembre 2009 à 01:19 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Only if you accept responsibility for making it work in makeinfo,
> > texi2pdf, and texi2html. This duplicates 10 or 20 commands in
> > macros.itexi. That's
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 03:44:29AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> If the waf system was working... and it had a good logging
> system for the doc-builds, good warnings, etc...
In case you're wondering what this means: GUB has an *excellent*
logging system. I really want something like that for t
Graham,
is it correct that all fixes, regardless of its annoyance, get a `low
priority' in case it won't become part of the next `milestone'
release?
I consider this categorization a bit coarse, and I would like to see
at least one more level to mark bugs as `annoying' or something like
that.
18 matches
Mail list logo