Marc
Should not the \revert be limited to TabVoice to avoid reverting the
property in other contexts? The same could be said for some of the
other \reverts too.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Hohl"
To: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:14 AM
Subject:
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc
Should not the \revert be limited to TabVoice to avoid reverting the
property in other contexts? The same could be said for some of the
other \reverts too.
Yes, of course. Attached is a reworked patch - I am not sure about
NoteCollision; should this be on
TabVoi
Yes, basically this is a sore point to use LilyPond as web service.
Even for powerful machines, having 10 persons or so using it is
effectively a DoS on the machine. Not to mention one can create
snippets requiring HOURS to render (say, lyrics with Asian
characters). So it is very critical
Marc Hohl wrote Thursday, October 15, 2009 9:36 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc
Should not the \revert be limited to TabVoice to avoid reverting
the
property in other contexts? The same could be said for some of
the
other \reverts too.
Yes, of course. Attached is a reworked patch
Look
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:30:54PM +0200, Harmath Dénes wrote:
> OK, this poses the following questions:
These questions have been raised before; please search the mailist
for previous discussions if you're serious about it.
> - What reasonable limitation can be established on the input, in aspec
I would like to submit a patch that adds two new accidental styles:
neo-modern-voice and neo-modern-voice-cautionary.
Regards,
Frédéric
0001-added-new-automatic-accidental-behaviours-neo-moder.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Thursday, October 15, 2009 9:36 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc
Should not the \revert be limited to TabVoice to avoid reverting the
property in other contexts? The same could be said for some of the
other \reverts too.
Yes, of course. Attached is a
