Are these two patches okay to apply?
I have a question about the second one.
Starting on line 845 in define-grob-properties.scm, there is a group
labeled "grobs & grob arrays", and of the 60 or so properties there, all
of them have type ly:grob or ly:grob-array, except the following nine.
Should
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:14:40PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> In preparing information on regression testing for the Contributors' Guide,
> I happened to check the downloadable regression test results at
>
> http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/test-output/
>
> I noticed that prior to 2.13.2
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:18:41PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 19 juillet 2009 à 02:07 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > - apply the attached patch.
>
> I (and probably other readers) miss the attachment.
Oops, sorry. I subconsciously tried to protect your eyes by not
attaching
2009/7/18 Carl Sorensen :
> Thanks for your creativity!
Could said "creativity" give birth to a LSR snippet as well? :-)
Regards,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(forwarded from -user)
Martin Hosken wrote:
> Is there any documentation that explains more of the internal workings
> of lilypond. I'm looking for something that explains how music events
> get to engravers and then what happens afterwards with the layout
> events. 'When' are stencils executed?
2009/7/19 Mark Polesky :
> Are these two patches okay to apply?
LGTM.
> Starting on line 845 in define-grob-properties.scm, there is a group
> labeled "grobs & grob arrays", and of the 60 or so properties there, all
> of them have type ly:grob or ly:grob-array, except the following nine.
> Should
Okay,
following the combined suggestions of Neil and Joe, I made these
changes to the define-grob-properties patch:
1) keep in "grobs & grob arrays." section, unmodified:
* (accidental-grobs ,list? ...)
2) keep in "grobs & grob arrays." section, but change type:
* (note-columns ,ly:grob-ar
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009, Hans Aberg said:
> ask them to provide proof that you were the
> clicker.
can we afford to pay the legal fees associated with the asking of that
question in court?
Why waste time debateing? find a willing tadpole and turn them loose.
--
Dana Emery
__
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 08:31:59AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> (forwarded from -user)
>
> Martin Hosken wrote:
> > Is there any documentation that explains more of the internal workings
> > of lilypond. I'm looking for something that explains how music events
> > get to engravers and then what
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 08:31:59AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> (forwarded from -user)
>>
>> Martin Hosken wrote:
>> > Is there any documentation that explains more of the internal workings
>> > of lilypond. I'm looking for something th
On 19 Jul 2009, at 19:52, > wrote:
ask them to provide proof that you were the
clicker.
can we afford to pay the legal fees associated with the asking of that
question in court?
Only in fair justice systems...
Why waste time debateing? find a willing tadpole and turn them loose.
...ther
On 7/19/09 12:58 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 08:31:59AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> (forwarded from -user)
>>
>> Martin Hosken wrote:
>>> Is there any documentation that explains more of the internal workings
>>> of lilypond. I'm looking for something that exp
12 matches
Mail list logo
