Joe Neeman schrieb:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:53 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/67174/diff/1/2#newcode237
Line 237: \layout {
It seems to me that we have 3 versions of tablature now: the "default"
version in engraver-init.ly, the version that appears if the user
i
Hi Patrick-the-incredible-helper,
When you build something in GUB, what build number (2.13.3-x) do
you get? I always get -0, even when I build a new package without
changing the version number. I suspect that this causes slight
breakage in certain scripts.
(this is a relatively low-priority que
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:01:22AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> Hi Patrick-the-incredible-helper,
>
> When you build something in GUB, what build number (2.13.3-x) do
> you get? I always get -0, even when I build a new package without
> changing the version number. I suspect that this causes
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:16:45AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > The new option, -dwarning-as-error, does *not* turn every warning into
> > an error. It only turns specific warnings (that don't exist without
> > this patch) into errors.
>
> Then the name is indeed too generic and should be
On di, 2009-07-07 at 01:16 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:01:22AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Hi Patrick-the-incredible-helper,
> >
> > When you build something in GUB, what build number (2.13.3-x) do
> > you get? I always get -0, even when I build a new package
On 7/7/09 1:56 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Joe Neeman schrieb:
>> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:53 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
http://codereview.appspot.com/67174/diff/1/2#newcode237
Line 237: \layout {
It seems to me that we have 3 versions of tablature now: the "default"
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:01:22AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
>> When you build something in GUB, what build number (2.13.3-x) do
>> you get? I always get -0, even when I build a new package without
>> changing the version number. I susp
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 01:24 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:16:45AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >
> > > The new option, -dwarning-as-error, does *not* turn every warning into
> > > an error. It only turns specific warnings (that don't exist without
> > > this patch)
[...]
I don't particularly mind breaking existing scores (as long as there is
a convert-ly rule to at least warn about the problem), but I don't think
the situation in the patch is particularly friendly. We've a long
tradition of choosing sensible behaviour over backwards compatibility
and I see
On 7/7/09 12:20 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> [...]
I don't particularly mind breaking existing scores (as long as there is
a convert-ly rule to at least warn about the problem), but I don't think
the situation in the patch is particularly friendly. We've a long
tradition of cho
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/diff/1/3
File scm/output-svg.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/diff/1/3#newcode140
Line 140: (match:substring match 1)))
Why not just (set-attribute 'font-weight "bold")?
Similarly below.
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/diff/1/3#newcode155
Reviewers: joeneeman,
Message:
Thanks for your review, Joe.
On 2009/07/07 18:32:44, joeneeman wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/diff/1/3
File scm/output-svg.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/diff/1/3#newcode140
Line 140: (match:substring match 1)))
Why not just (set-a
On 2009/07/07 21:10:54, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/91075/diff/1/3#newcode155
> Line 155: (set! alist (reverse alist))
> You can use reverse! here
Oddly, this did not work. I tried
(reverse! alist)
(apply entity 'text expr alist)))
Never mind. Patch Set
Hello,
The third revision of my patch set (Patch Set 5) is on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/83046/show
The change from Patch Set 4 is the generalization of
-dwarning-as-error. Note that this is a series of 8 commits that
contain more in-depth commit summaries. They can be found here:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
>> I have just been removing the package files manually, but there is
>> probably a better (but undocumented) way to do this.
>
> Try
>
> bin/gpkg --help :-)
Okay, thanks Jan. :-) This doesn't achieve what I was hoping for though.
Is th
Hi,
has anyone tried the Frescobaldi editor for Lilypond?
http://www.frescobaldi.org/
I've only had time to play with it for 5 minutes so far but it looks
like an extremely easy to use and quit feature-rich editor which is
specifically taylored to editing Lilypond files in a simple way.
Shoul
Hi,
am I missing something or is the only thing that is needed to solve
the first part of issue #685 (see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=685 ) a one-line
change as in the attached patch? As for the second part, are log files
still created by default? This doesn't seem to be the
We are already planning a section about such editors. I'll
contact you in a week or two, to write that section.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:14:58PM +0900, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anyone tried the Frescobaldi editor for Lilypond?
>
>http://www.frescobaldi.org/
18 matches
Mail list logo
