[PATCH] Re: Problems regarding figured bass

2009-06-15 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 15. Juni 2009 10:26:09 schrieb Arno Rog: > Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes: > > Hi all, > > I'm running into several problems with figured bass while writing another > > large orchestral piece. Attached is a sample file highlightin

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

2009-06-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > my version: > > (define-public (split-at-predicate predicate lst) > "Split LST (into 2 lists) at the first element that returns #f for > (PREDICATE previous_element element), and return the 2 new lists as a > pair. Example: (split-at-pre

Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems regarding figured bass

2009-06-15 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 15. Juni 2009 10:26:09 schrieb Arno Rog: Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes: Hi all, I'm running into several problems with figured bass while writing another large orchestral piece. Attached is a sample

Re: GUB test-lily/dist-check.py looking at src/ instead of build/ ?

2009-06-15 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > Following up the latest build error, I noticed that > test-lily/dist-check.py does: >  ... > Why is it attempting to link from the ../src/.. dir, instead of > the ../build/.. dir?  I mean, we shouldn't expect to see any > generated files li

Re: development on windows

2009-06-15 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive. Successfully built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop. Thanks for the fun. Bert > Graham Percival wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:44:30PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: >>> On 6/13/09 11:39 PM, "Bertalan Fodor" wrote: >

should we provide an empty stencil?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
Since setting a grob's stencil prop to #f can trigger errors, I discovered the following workaround. Do we have anything like this already? If not, shouldn't we? Is there a better way than using an empty postscript string? - Mark #(define-public empty-stencil (ly:make-stencil (list 'embedded

Re: development on windows

2009-06-15 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Bertalan Fodor wrote: Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive. Successfully built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop. Thanks for the fun. Bert Cool! Thanks for testing, Bert. Did you get the Guest Additions installed successfully? Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http

Re: development on windows

2009-06-15 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
Yes, that was a good idea. Now I'm gonna try this thing out on my Eee Pc. :) Jonathan Kulp wrote: Bertalan Fodor wrote: Now I'm running lilybuntu in Sun VirtualBox from my pendrive. Successfully built LilyPond, now I start playing with kdevelop. Thanks for the fun. Bert Cool! Thanks for

Re: should we provide an empty stencil?

2009-06-15 Thread Gilles THIBAULT
Since setting a grob's stencil prop to #f can trigger errors, I discovered the following workaround. Do we have anything like this already? Yes. empty-stencil is already defined in "define-markup-commands.scm", by : (define-public empty-stencil (ly:make-stencil '() '(1 . -1) '(1 . -1))) Well,

Re: development on windows

2009-06-15 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <20090614225255.ga7...@nagi>, Graham Percival writes 2) I don't know what the current favorite fancy IDE is, although I'm fairly certain that Eclipse runs on Linux. I'm not certain if that would actually be good for LilyPond, though -- does it support C++ and makefiles? IIRC eclips

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-15 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <4a33fbd3.2040...@gmail.com>, Jonathan Kulp writes Graham Percival wrote: 3) Ok, so why do I want to use texinfo so much? - makes pdfs+info. I personally *never* use those formats, but I know that some people still use them. IMO, if we're going to support those formats for th

Re: development on windows

2009-06-15 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > In message <20090614225255.ga7...@nagi>, Graham Percival > writes > >2) I don't know what the current favorite fancy IDE is, although > >I'm fairly certain that Eclipse runs on Linux. I'm not certain if > >that would actually be good for Li

Re: should we provide an empty stencil?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
Gilles THIBAULT wrote: > empty-stencil is already defined in "define-markup-commands.scm" Ha! missed that one, thanks. So I checked out define-markup-commands.scm, and found this: (define-public empty-stencil (ly:make-stencil '() '(1 . -1) '(1 . -1))) (define-public point-stencil (ly:make-stenci

Re: unable to make doc

2009-06-15 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 11/06/2009 23:02, Graham Percival disait : On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:12:08PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: GPL Ghostscript 8.63 (2008-08-01) Hmm. I'm using ghostscript 8.62 and building correctly. GUB was recently updated to use 8.65. It works well with a 8.64 gohstscript.

Re: unable to make doc

2009-06-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:54:16PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 11/06/2009 23:02, Graham Percival disait : >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:12:08PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: >>> GPL Ghostscript 8.63 (2008-08-01) >> >> Hmm. I'm using ghostscript 8.62 and building correctly.

is dot-count really a user settable property?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
IR 3.2.24 dots-interface says dot-count is a user settable property, but this doesn't do anything: { \override Dots #'dot-count = #3 c'' } - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l

Re: is dot-count really a user settable property?

2009-06-15 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
The Dots grob only gets created if the underlying note has at least one dot. On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > IR 3.2.24 dots-interface says dot-count is a user > settable property, but this doesn't do anything: > > { \override Dots #'dot-count = #3 c'' } -- Han-Wen Nienhuys

Re: is dot-count really a user settable property?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > The Dots grob only gets created if the underlying > note has at least one dot. But neither of these do anything either: { \override Dots #'dot-count = #0 c''4. } { \override Dots #'dot-count = #3 c''4. } ___ lilypo

Re: is dot-count really a user settable property?

2009-06-15 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/6/16 Mark Polesky : > But neither of these do anything either: > { \override Dots #'dot-count = #0 c''4. } > { \override Dots #'dot-count = #3 c''4. } That's because the Dots_engraver overrides 'dot-count, which means your override is ignored: 46 d->set_property ("dot-count", scm_fr

some sort of suppress-accidental?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
entering { \displayMusic c'! } yields: (make-music 'EventChord 'elements (list (make-music 'NoteEvent 'force-accidental #t 'duration (ly:make-duration 2 0 1 1) 'pitch (ly:make-pitch 0 0 0 I wish there were a similar

Re: is dot-count really a user settable property?

2009-06-15 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: >> But neither of these do anything either: >> { \override Dots #'dot-count = #0 c''4. } >> { \override Dots #'dot-count = #3 c''4. } > > That's because the Dots_engraver overrides 'dot-count, which means > your override is ignored: > >  46    

working on the new website

2009-06-15 Thread Graham Percival
Current version: http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html#Home got the general design of Introduction and Download, but I've decided that it's time to get more people involved. Here's your cut&paste section; it grabs 12 megs or so. mkdir web-gop ; cd web-gop git init-db gi

Re: development on windows

2009-06-15 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Well, Eclipse runs very well on my netbook with Atom and 2gb ram. But the cdt is still very limited. Also its startup from the pen drive is too slop. But kdevelop seems all right, which has ctags integration and looks up macro definitions in a second. Bert ___

Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?

2009-06-15 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Mark Polesky wrote: entering { \displayMusic c'! } yields: (make-music 'EventChord 'elements (list (make-music 'NoteEvent 'force-accidental #t 'duration (ly:make-duration 2 0 1 1) 'pitch (ly:make-pitch 0 0 0 I wish

accessing absolute pitch data from within \relative?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
I want to retrieve absolute pitch data from within a \relative block but I can't figure it out. Here's my work so far. Probably there's a much easier way. If so, let me know! By the way, is this a -user or a -devel question? Sometimes I post to -devel just so I don't scare -user newbies away with

Re: accessing absolute pitch data from within \relative?

2009-06-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mark, I want to retrieve absolute pitch data from within a \relative block but I can't figure it out. Here's my work so far. Probably there's a much easier way. If so, let me know! How's this? \version "2.12.2" #(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f) relativeMusic = \relative { c' d e f

Re: accessing absolute pitch data from within \relative?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Polesky
Kieren MacMillan wrote: > How's this? > > relativeMusic = \relative > { > c' d e f g g, a b c1 > } > > \displayLilyMusic \relativeMusic Kieren, The \displayLilyMusic is not within the \relative block. So it's the same situation; the command works fine outside the \relative block, but not wit