> Thanks, fixed in git. It's better, though, if you send these to the
> bug list.
OK. BTW, are you getting reports of items which I directly enter into
the bug data base?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lis
> > Here is a very simple counterexample: lilypond fails with `Can't
> > fit systems on page -- ignoring between-system-padding' warnings
> > for no good reason, messing up the output. This is a very serious
> > bug.
>
> Thanks, fixed in git. You will still get one "Can't fit systems on
> page"
On Saturday 24 February 2007 19:28, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Thanks, fixed in git. It's better, though, if you send these to the
> > bug list.
>
> OK. BTW, are you getting reports of items which I directly enter into
> the bug data base?
I get the emails that the bug tracker sends if that's what
On Saturday 24 February 2007 19:31, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > Here is a very simple counterexample: lilypond fails with `Can't
> > > fit systems on page -- ignoring between-system-padding' warnings
> > > for no good reason, messing up the output. This is a very serious
> > > bug.
> >
> > Thanks,
We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so
greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of
lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does Y have to you
it a means of calling upon lilypond in a more sparing mode? Is the speed
of execution of l
El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 10:27:51 +0100, laurent-ducos dijo:
> We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so
> greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of
> lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does Y have to you
> it a means of
I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program
resident so that invocation are less painful.
Unless it is being swapped out to the virtual memory.
Office and OpenOffice do
They are swapped out as well. And you gain nothing.
Bert
Francisco Vila escreveu:
> El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 10:27:51 +0100, laurent-ducos dijo:
>> We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so
>> greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of
>> lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does
El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 12:07:34 +0100, Bertalan Fodor dijo:
>
> >I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program
> >resident so that invocation are less painful.
> Unless it is being swapped out to the virtual memory.
>
> >Office and OpenOffice do
> >
> They are swappe
Well, in the case of LilyPond it is sure, that we can achieve better
performance if all the declaration, font and everything stuff is not
loaded each time.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
Hi, the default whole and half rest size is much too large, using
Lilypond 2.11.19. For each whole or half rest, I have resorted to
putting in "\set fontSize = #-2.5" before the rest. Could this be
changed for a future release? Thanks all,
Scott
__
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The best way to do this, is to write a scheme extension that reads file
> names from a socket or a pipe, processes those. Then you can save on the
> startup time of LilyPond.
Didn't Graham do something like this, calling it LilyPond server?
C
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
The best way to do this, is to write a scheme extension that reads file
names from a socket or a pipe, processes those. Then you can save on the
startup time of LilyPond.
Didn't Graham do something like this, calling it
13 matches
Mail list logo
