[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> [CVS 2004-03-10 9:50 MET]
>
> With the current vertical size of flats I think it is not appropriate
> to allow the same horizontal position if the interval is a sixth --
> they almost do touch (see image). If you insist on that, how can I
> configure this?
I've add
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> With the current vertical size of flats
Do you implicitely suggest to prefer another size of flats instead of
an adapte algorithm?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilyp
> > With the current vertical size of flats
>
> Do you implicitely suggest to prefer another size of flats instead of
> an adapte algorithm?
No. I like lilypond's vertical size of flats. But I've seen scores
where flats are smaller so that they can be positionad at the same
horizontal position
[CVS 2004-03-10 9:50 MET]
With the current vertical size of flats I think it is not appropriate
to allow the same horizontal position if the interval is a sixth --
they almost do touch (see image). If you insist on that, how can I
configure this?
Werner
<>__
