Re: version number question

2005-08-30 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 09.27, David Bobroff wrote: > In the current CVS directory it says: > > (PACKAGE_NAME): VERSION release 2.7.8 > > When compiled it reports that it is v2.7.9. A similar thing happened > when patch-level hit 2.7.7. When compiled, LilyPond claimed that it was > version 2.7.

Re: version number question

2005-08-30 Thread Graham Percival
On 30-Aug-05, at 12:27 AM, David Bobroff wrote: In the current CVS directory it says: (PACKAGE_NAME): VERSION release 2.7.8 When compiled it reports that it is v2.7.9. A similar thing happened when patch-level hit 2.7.7. When compiled, LilyPond claimed that it was version 2.7.8. Yes --

version number question

2005-08-30 Thread David Bobroff
In the current CVS directory it says: (PACKAGE_NAME): VERSION release 2.7.8 When compiled it reports that it is v2.7.9. A similar thing happened when patch-level hit 2.7.7. When compiled, LilyPond claimed that it was version 2.7.8. While this probably isn't a real problem it looks odd to me.