[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Recently, the (default) appearance of triplet brackets have
> > > changed [...]
> >
> > Try fiddling with TupletBracket #'gap (let me know what value you
> > like best.)
>
> The current default value of the gap on the left side is fine, but on
> the right it should
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Additionally, I suggest to reduce the default thickness of triplet
> lines a bit; I also believe that the size of the triplet number must
> influence the triplet line thickness, otherwise it looks ugly in
> staves with reduced size.
No, I think that the triplet number
> > Recently, the (default) appearance of triplet brackets have
> > changed [...]
>
> Try fiddling with TupletBracket #'gap (let me know what value you
> like best.)
The current default value of the gap on the left side is fine, but on
the right it should have the same distance (see attached image
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> Lilypond fails to compile latest cvs, Changelog 1.1707:
Try again now.
Han-Wen
(hacking away at CVS)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
Lilypond-devel mailing
Hi,
Lilypond fails to compile latest cvs, Changelog 1.1707:
==
Now processing: `lily-2003481231.ly'
Parsing...warning: Can't find property type-check for `octavation'
(music-type?). Perhaps you made a typing error?
lilypond-book:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Recently, the (default) appearance of triplet brackets have changed
> from
>
> 3
>
> to
>
> 3
>
> which is ugly. Was this intentional? If yes, why?
Semi-intentional. The gap was off by a factor two relative to its
definition. I've upda
Recently, the (default) appearance of triplet brackets have changed
from
3
to
3
which is ugly. Was this intentional? If yes, why?
Werner
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman
