Re: ugly boxes

2011-06-13 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Lily-Devel List" Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:28 PM Subject: Re: ugly boxes "Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:it2a6b$kgt$1...@dough.gmane.org... I'm continuing

Re: ugly boxes

2011-06-12 Thread Trevor Daniels
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:it2a6b$kgt$1...@dough.gmane.org... I'm continuing to look at the build system, and studying the output of make doc see lots of the following: Overfull \hbox (plus some other stuff) It would seem there are 2 options: either fix the text/diagram sizes, or

Re: Doc: ugly boxes

2011-06-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > There are quite a few of these in, say, the 2.14 NR - see the PDF > page 33 and 37 for example. I don't think these should be there > (although I had previously assumed they were change bars). Those boxes on page 33 are caused from sp

Re: Doc: ugly boxes

2011-06-12 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 6/12/11 6:07 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: > I'm continuing to look at the build system, and studying the output of make > doc see lots of the following: > > Overfull \hbox (plus some other stuff) > > Looking on the web for what this means, I found > http://docs.freebsd.org/info/texinfo/texinfo.

Doc: ugly boxes

2011-06-12 Thread Phil Holmes
I'm continuing to look at the build system, and studying the output of make doc see lots of the following: Overfull \hbox (plus some other stuff) Looking on the web for what this means, I found http://docs.freebsd.org/info/texinfo/texinfo.info.Overfull_hboxes.html which says: "TeX is somet