Hello,
On 1 May 2012 08:52, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote:
>> On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote:
On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In the following, even though I've t
On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote:
Hello,
On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote:
On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil
was there:
[...] I want the number there, b
Hello,
On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>>
>>> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
>>> stencil, the tuplet
Hello,
On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
> stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil
> was there:
>>>
>>> [...] I want the number there, but
