On 2008/05/31, I wrote:
> OK, so I'm going to start the makefile brain-surgery so we have 3 WWW
> stages, I'll push to dev/texi2html when it works.
Done. As positive side effects, it's now possible to build docs only in
PDF and Info (by issuing 'make web-1'), and the strange make loop which
somet
On 2008/05/30, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> The main problem, already explained by John: Since we will have multiple
> subsections in one file, the links won't be that easy, because you can no
> longer defer the file name from the link name. So I suppose, there would need
> to be a first run with
On Fri, 30 May 2008 17:15:17 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > 2) Are there any remaining technical issues with our build system
> > (ie translations)?
>
> One thing, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> What's the status of the texi2html output?
>
> 1) Are there any remaining bugs or missing features in texi2html
> that we'd like to see?
Not that I'm aware of. Of course, there remain some issues
On 2008/05/23, Graham Percival wrote:
> What's the status of the texi2html output?
>
> 1) Are there any remaining bugs or missing features in texi2html
> that we'd like to see? Patrick is planning on making a release
> soon, and it would be silly if we discovered an important problem
> right af
What's the status of the texi2html output?
1) Are there any remaining bugs or missing features in texi2html
that we'd like to see? Patrick is planning on making a release
soon, and it would be silly if we discovered an important problem
right after a release:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/te
