Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:22:30PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Ok, I've just modified the VERSION file with a great fanfare. And
>> > by "great fanfare" I mean sitting in my room in my underwear,
>> > listening to a BBC radio documen
Trevor Daniels a écrit :
No, it's OK. Just a mild preference. Not worth any trouble.
I'd added a new section or two which caused a renumbering.
It's not really a problem.
Agreed; FWIW I backported a lot of doc changes in early 2.12 versions
and IIRC nobody complained about renumbering. Oh yes
Graham Percival wrote Monday, February 23, 2009 1:52 PM
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:59:44PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
Hi guys,
Trevor Daniels a écrit :
I'd go along with going straight to 2.13 too. AFAIK there are
no serious outstanding issues with 2.12.2 that must be fixed,
and I feel a
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:22:30PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Ok, I've just modified the VERSION file with a great fanfare. And
> > by "great fanfare" I mean sitting in my room in my underwear,
> > listening to a BBC radio documentary about torturers.
> > ... yea
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:59:44PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
>
>> There should be a 2.12.3 for Japanese translation, but this doesn't
>> prevent us to start 2.13 on master branch right now: we else can
>> branch out from master a branch named stable/2.12 and use it to
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:59:44PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Trevor Daniels a écrit :
>> I'd go along with going straight to 2.13 too. AFAIK there are
>> no serious outstanding issues with 2.12.2 that must be fixed,
>> and I feel a little uncomfortable with some of the doc changes
Hi guys,
Trevor Daniels a écrit :
I'd go along with going straight to 2.13 too. AFAIK there are
no serious outstanding issues with 2.12.2 that must be fixed,
and I feel a little uncomfortable with some of the doc changes
which will appear in the next release. I'd rather they went into 2.13.
The
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, February 22, 2009 11:59 AM
If GUB3 is currently working and Han-wen feels like spending an
hour or two cutting a release and there are no problems -- all
three assumptons being fairly tenuous -- then I suppose we could
wait until 2.12.3 is out there. But I'm highl
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:14:15PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch to
> > 2.13 and get started with all the major changes. If somebody
> > complains, then we'll wait until 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 schrieb Graham Percival:
> Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch to
> 2.13 and get started with all the major changes. If somebody
> complains, then we'll wait until 2.12.3 is out, and then move to
Graham Percival a écrit :
IIRC there were already two patches that are waiting to be applied
that were put off until 2.13. Trevor was talking about
reshuffling the text crescendo commands.
OK, this is probably enough to start 2.13 in one week.
I just finished
unpacking today (yeah, 3.5 wee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 18:22:28 John Mandereau wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Has anything urgent happened since 2.12.2 was released? I can't
> > think of anything.
> >
> > Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch t
Yes, the Japanese translation. I think it deserves a 2.12.3.
Good point. OK, we'll wait a week or so.
That's perfect.
Yes, that's totally my job. Umm... do you mean about 2.12.2, or
about 2.13 when that happens?
Talking from my little experience in announcing releases, it may be too la
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 12:29:15PM -0500, Laura Conrad wrote:
> > "John" == John Mandereau writes:
>
> John> What major changes are expected? Are there already significant
> John> changes that deserve switching to 2.13 very soon? Minor syntax
> John> changes are not worthwhile I
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:26:56PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Sorry for double posting, I hit the key for sending too early.
>
> Graham Percival a écrit :
>> Has anything urgent happened since 2.12.2 was released?
>
> Yes, the Japanese translation. I think it deserves a 2.12.3.
Good point. O
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:22:28PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
>> Has anything urgent happened since 2.12.2 was released? I can't
>> think of anything.
>>
>> Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch to
>> 2.13 and get started with all the major c
> "John" == John Mandereau writes:
>> Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch to
>> 2.13 and get started with all the major changes.
John> What major changes are expected? Are there already significant
John> changes that deserve switching to 2.13 very
Sorry for double posting, I hit the key for sending too early.
Graham Percival a écrit :
Has anything urgent happened since 2.12.2 was released?
Yes, the Japanese translation. I think it deserves a 2.12.3.
I can't
think of anything.
What about posting an announcement on info-lilypond an
Graham Percival a écrit :
Has anything urgent happened since 2.12.2 was released? I can't
think of anything.
Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch to
2.13 and get started with all the major changes.
What major changes are expected? Are there already significant chan
Has anything urgent happened since 2.12.2 was released? I can't
think of anything.
Unless anybody complains within the next 48 hours, we'll switch to
2.13 and get started with all the major changes. If somebody
complains, then we'll wait until 2.12.3 is out, and then move to
.13.
Cheers,
- Grah
20 matches
Mail list logo
