Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: > On Jan 30, 2020, at 14:57, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> os.symlink ("../../../out-baseline/share", >> "out-www/offline-root/input/regression/out-test-baseline/share") >> >> What has the test baseline to do with make doc ? > > 💡 Character code properties: customize what to sho

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 30, 2020, at 14:57, David Kastrup wrote: > > os.symlink ("../../../out-baseline/share", > "out-www/offline-root/input/regression/out-test-baseline/share") > > What has the test baseline to do with make doc ? 💡 Try cherry-picking this: commit dbe42f99406cd415c4b7d1f7349cd3e17ed73e69 Aut

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: > On Jan 30, 2020, at 13:39, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> I just had a successful mage -j5 doc as of commit >>> 8a05312fd8d2a56ec724a793b313949db0cfe729 >> >> Current stable/2.20 which failed on my system. > > I also am not able to reproduce the problem in a clean workspace; bu

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: > On Jan 30, 2020, at 13:39, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> I just had a successful mage -j5 doc as of commit >>> 8a05312fd8d2a56ec724a793b313949db0cfe729 >> >> Current stable/2.20 which failed on my system. > > I also am not able to reproduce the problem in a clean workspace; bu

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 30, 2020, at 13:39, David Kastrup wrote: > >> I just had a successful mage -j5 doc as of commit >> 8a05312fd8d2a56ec724a793b313949db0cfe729 > > Current stable/2.20 which failed on my system. I also am not able to reproduce the problem in a clean workspace; but I have verified that I wan

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > Le 30/01/2020 à 19:46, David Kastrup a écrit : >> Oops. >> dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ git checkout origin >> error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by >> checkout: >> Documentation/snippets/non-traditional.snippet-list

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 30/01/2020 à 19:46, David Kastrup a écrit : Oops. dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ git checkout origin error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by checkout: Documentation/snippets/non-traditional.snippet-list Please move or remove them before you switch

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: >> >>> Le 30/01/2020 à 19:08, David Kastrup a écrit : Dan Eble writes: > On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup wrote: >> That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 30/01/2020 à 19:39, David Kastrup a écrit : Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: It took about half an hour, and I don't know if it matters, but I build in the root directory. As do I. I just tried PYTHONVERBOSE=2 PYTHONPATH=/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/python/out:`pwd`/python/auxiliar /usr/local

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > >> Le 30/01/2020 à 19:08, David Kastrup a écrit : >>> Dan Eble writes: >>> On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup wrote: > That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from > cherry-picking further

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > Le 30/01/2020 à 19:08, David Kastrup a écrit : >> Dan Eble writes: >> >>> On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup wrote: That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from cherry-picking further material: the last version of th

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 30/01/2020 à 19:08, David Kastrup a écrit : Dan Eble writes: On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup wrote: That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from cherry-picking further material: the last version of the branch I checked was from early December and it fa

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
Dan Eble writes: > On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup wrote: >> That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from >> cherry-picking further material: the last version of the branch I >> checked was from early December and it failed in the same manner. >> Compilation

Re: stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread Dan Eble
On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:39, David Kastrup wrote: > That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from > cherry-picking further material: the last version of the branch I > checked was from early December and it failed in the same manner. > Compilation of CPU_COUNT=9 make -j9 d

stable/2.20 branch does not complete "make doc"

2020-01-30 Thread David Kastrup
That's not a new development, so there is no point in me to refrain from cherry-picking further material: the last version of the branch I checked was from early December and it failed in the same manner. Compilation of CPU_COUNT=9 make -j9 doc ends with find ./out-www/web -name '*.html' | xargs