>> For LilyPond 2.21, we should upgrade fontconfig, in my humble
>> opinion. But, for LilyPond 2.20, I'm wondering whether we should
>> upgrade or not.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the new fontconfig has significant
>> changes.
>
> I created https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/52
Hello,
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:51:47 +0900 (JST), Masamichi Hosoda
wrote:
> [... replacing] 2.12.6 [... with] 2.12.93 indeed provides ~100x
> improvement and builds the cache on my system in 600ms.
> >>>
> >
> >>> This was a report of using fontconfig on Windows, IIRC. So my
> >>> qu
[... replacing] 2.12.6 [... with] 2.12.93 indeed provides ~100x
improvement and builds the cache on my system in 600ms.
>>>
>
>>> This was a report of using fontconfig on Windows, IIRC. So my
>>> question: Does the Windows tarball of lilypond contain a recent
>>> fontconfig version?
>>
>>> [... replacing] 2.12.6 [... with] 2.12.93 indeed provides ~100x
>>> improvement and builds the cache on my system in 600ms.
>>
>> This was a report of using fontconfig on Windows, IIRC. So my
>> question: Does the Windows tarball of lilypond contain a recent
>> fontconfig version?
>
> Accord
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 4:52 AM
Subject: speed of fontconfig
I've just read the following on the fontconfig mailing list.
[... replacing] 2.12.6 [... with] 2.12.93 indeed provides ~100x
improvement and buil
I've just read the following on the fontconfig mailing list.
> [... replacing] 2.12.6 [... with] 2.12.93 indeed provides ~100x
> improvement and builds the cache on my system in 600ms.
This was a report of using fontconfig on Windows, IIRC. So my
question: Does the Windows tarball of lilypond c
