Re: sorry about the missing regtests

2010-12-15 Thread Neil Puttock
On 14 December 2010 23:18, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > > On 12/14/10 4:15 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > >> I only just realized that I should have done >>   git add input/regression/*.ly >> after apply Neil's patches with patch -p1 < foo.diff >> Sorry about that. > > Well, I don't think that eith

Re: sorry about the missing regtests

2010-12-15 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 12/15/10 12:28 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote: > Am 15.12.2010 00:18, schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> >> >> On 12/14/10 4:15 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: >> >>> I only just realized that I should have done >>>git add input/regression/*.ly >>> after apply Neil's patches with patch -p1< foo.diff >>

Re: sorry about the missing regtests

2010-12-14 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 15.12.2010 00:18, schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 12/14/10 4:15 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: I only just realized that I should have done git add input/regression/*.ly after apply Neil's patches with patch -p1< foo.diff Sorry about that. Well, I don't think that either of Neil's patches in

Re: sorry about the missing regtests

2010-12-14 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 12/14/10 4:15 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > I only just realized that I should have done > git add input/regression/*.ly > after apply Neil's patches with patch -p1 < foo.diff > Sorry about that. Well, I don't think that either of Neil's patches included regtests. I had regtests in my

sorry about the missing regtests

2010-12-14 Thread Graham Percival
I only just realized that I should have done git add input/regression/*.ly after apply Neil's patches with patch -p1 < foo.diff Sorry about that. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list