Le jeudi 17 décembre 2009 à 15:31 +0100, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> Yeah. I can imagine that autogen.sh script handles this – for regular
> tarballs this isn't necessary.
>
> John?
Sorry, but I'd rather concentrate on other things than the old build
system (which include autogen and configure),
>> It would make life a bit easier for testers who are directly
>> compiling from git if the SHA1 number (perhaps the first eight
>> digits only) could be shown in the output of
>>
>> lilypond --version
>>
>> Any chance to add this?
>
> The common way is to do something like "$(shell git descr
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> It would make life a bit easier for testers who are directly compiling
> from git if the SHA1 number (perhaps the first eight digits only) could
> be shown in the output of
>
> lilypond --version
>
> Any chance to add this?
The common way is
It would make life a bit easier for testers who are directly compiling
from git if the SHA1 number (perhaps the first eight digits only)
could be shown in the output of
lilypond --version
Any chance to add this?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mail
