This is now abandoned; a new (working) version was created by Carl here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4662055/
(google code issue 1709)
cheers,
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273119/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https:
Am 16.06.2011 23:19, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 6/16/11 2:57 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
2011/6/14 Marc Hohl:
Am 13.06.2011 22:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files
On 6/16/11 2:57 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
> 2011/6/14 Marc Hohl :
>> Am 13.06.2011 22:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>>>
>>> 2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
>>>
>>> An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files in
>>> feta-fl
2011/6/14 Marc Hohl :
> Am 13.06.2011 22:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>>
>> 2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł:
>>>
>>> Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
>>
>> An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files in
>> feta-flags?
>> Is it possible to tell our build system to compile fe
W dniu 15 czerwca 2011 15:52 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
napisał:
> On 6/13/11 1:17 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
> wrote:
>> we are back to the same question: how to pass
>> black_notehead_width to feta-flags from feta-noteheads.
>
> Have you tried eliminating the "numeric black_notehead_width;" line from
>
On 6/13/11 1:17 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
> Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed) - i have no idea
> why... Maybe i forgot to make clean when i tested it before, but i'm
> almost sure i didn't. Still, this looks like the only possible
> explanation.
> Mike tested it too and he got f
Am 13.06.2011 22:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files in feta-flags?
Is it possible to tell our build system to compile feta-noteheads
first and feta-flags (which would
On 11-06-13 01:17 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed) - i have no idea
why... Maybe i forgot to make clean when i tested it before, but i'm
almost sure i didn't. Still, this looks like the only possible
explanation.
Mike tested it too and he got flags as sq
2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł :
> Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files in feta-flags?
Is it possible to tell our build system to compile feta-noteheads
first and feta-flags (which would contain a reference to
feta-noteheads.otf-g
LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273119/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2011/6/11 :
Looks good, but untested. I'll test it when I can.
Ok. Don't forget to make clean in build/mf - there are still missing
dependencies.
Thanks!
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273119/diff/3001/mf/feta-noteheads.mf
File mf/feta-noteheads.mf (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4
Looks good, but untested. I'll test it when I can.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273119/diff/3001/mf/feta-noteheads.mf
File mf/feta-noteheads.mf (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273119/diff/3001/mf/feta-noteheads.mf#newcode45
mf/feta-noteheads.mf:45: numeric black_notehead_width;
Perha
with Carl's help, new patch set was uploaded. Now the flags aren't
squished, so it's perhaps ready to go :)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273119/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-de
2011/3/27 Carl Sorensen :
>
> On 3/26/11 5:01 PM, "lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunetely there is a strange error: flags are now horizontally
>> squished (despite calling "make clean" before "make"), see
>> http://img829.imageshack.us/i/screenshotpxx.png/
>> Why this happen
On 3/26/11 5:01 PM, "lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Reviewers: ,
>
> Message:
> Hi,
>
> we are going to have multiple variants of each flag, fine-tuned to fit
> particular stem lengths. This means LOTS of flag glyphs.
> When experimenting some time ago i discovered that adding to
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi,
we are going to have multiple variants of each flag, fine-tuned to fit
particular stem lengths. This means LOTS of flag glyphs.
When experimenting some time ago i discovered that adding too many
glyphs results in error. I suppose it means there's a limit of how many
gly
16 matches
Mail list logo
