Dan Eble writes:
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 23:59 , Dan Eble wrote:
>> In your opinion, does scm_gc_mark (smob->self_scm ()) deserve to be
>> implemented as member function in Smob?
>
> Never mind. That seems like a slippery slope.
I remember it being a complication wi
On Aug 27, 2015, at 23:59 , Dan Eble wrote:
> In your opinion, does scm_gc_mark (smob->self_scm ()) deserve to be
> implemented as member function in Smob?
Never mind. That seems like a slippery slope.
—
Dan
___
lilypond-devel mai
In your opinion, does scm_gc_mark (smob->self_scm ()) deserve to be implemented
as member function in Smob? If so, what would you name it? Thanks.
—
Dan
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
