Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2015-03-14 Thread dak
On 2015/03/14 14:48:43, hanwenn wrote: seems I have some drafts left :-) I am pretty sure that draft beer gets stale after considerably less than five years. https://codereview.appspot.com/181109/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.o

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2015-03-14 Thread hanwenn
. Why would you want to softcode it? Done. Description: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. * input/regression/scheme-engraver.ly shows a basic example. * extend \consists syntax to accept an alist of callables. * add Scheme_engraver which is the C++ glue to the Scheme callables. *

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-10 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:08:09PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On 2010-01-09, Graham Percival wrote: >> > typography-demo.ly is already in the regtests. Do we want to keep >> > all the below? >> > - bach sarabande >> > - schubert morgenlier >> > - mozart horn conce

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-10 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:08:09PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On 2010-01-09, Graham Percival wrote: > > typography-demo.ly is already in the regtests. Do we want to keep > > all the below? > > - bach sarabande > > - schubert morgenlier > > - mozart horn concerto > > - les-nereides > > Yes, l

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-09 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2010-01-09, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:51:26AM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > > What was the reasoning for removing everything? > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-10/msg00101.html > as well as 2 or 3 earlier messages to -devel (between 1 an

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-09 Thread David Kastrup
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > All done and submitted. Thanks. I needed that. Now I'll have a go at figuring out just what to do with it for my personal task list. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-08 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:51:26AM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On a unrelated note, I noticed that all of the input files under > input/ have been removed in > > 2c89fdcaa84c848c9a81bc3b74d26359a1e93529 > Author: Graham Percival 2009-10-04 > 10:42:12 > > while I applaud trimmng the direct

Re: Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
All done and submitted. On a unrelated note, I noticed that all of the input files under input/ have been removed in 2c89fdcaa84c848c9a81bc3b74d26359a1e93529 Author: Graham Percival 2009-10-04 10:42:12 while I applaud trimmng the directory, some of these files have actually been instrumental t

Add basic scheme programmable engravers. (issue181109)

2010-01-01 Thread joeneeman
Neat! http://codereview.appspot.com/181109/diff/17/21 File lily/context-scheme.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/181109/diff/17/21#newcode26 lily/context-scheme.cc:26: // TODO: naming - should use now? I think ly:context-current-moment is clearer (although of course it isn't consistent

scheme programmable engravers

2009-12-30 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
http://codereview.appspot.com/181109/show there are some open todos, which I'll look into, probably over the weekend, but here is a sample: Interpreting music... (initialize # )(start-trans # )(process-music # )(process-acknowledged # )(saw: # coming from #)(process-acknowledged # )(process-ac