Re: remote branches

2020-12-27 Thread Thomas Morley
gt; > > The patch this branch was used for was merged some time ago and I > > > > always initiated to delete the source branch. > > > > > > > > Why is this branch still there? > > > > > > git doesn't delete remote branches on its own, you s

Re: remote branches

2020-10-29 Thread David Kastrup
branch was used for was merged some time ago and I >> > > always initiated to delete the source branch. >> > > >> > > Why is this branch still there? >> > >> > git doesn't delete remote branches on its own, you should do >> >

Re: remote branches

2020-10-29 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
-a > > > on my local repository I see a plethora of branches like: > > > remotes/origin/dev/harm/cleanup-fret-diagrams.scm > > > > > > The patch this branch was used for was merged some time ago and I > > > always initiated to delete the source branch.

Re: remote branches

2020-10-27 Thread Thomas Morley
harm/cleanup-fret-diagrams.scm > > > > The patch this branch was used for was merged some time ago and I > > always initiated to delete the source branch. > > > > Why is this branch still there? > > git doesn't delete remote branches on its own, you should

Re: remote branches

2020-10-27 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
time ago and I > always initiated to delete the source branch. > > Why is this branch still there? git doesn't delete remote branches on its own, you should do $ git fetch -p origin (short for --prune) once in a while. Jonas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

remote branches

2020-10-27 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi, if I do git branch -a on my local repository I see a plethora of branches like: remotes/origin/dev/harm/cleanup-fret-diagrams.scm The patch this branch was used for was merged some time ago and I always initiated to delete the source branch. Why is this branch still there? Cheers, Harm

Re: access to all remote branches

2014-03-11 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again, On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:39 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: [...] > Could it be something I need to change in a config file? > > Yes, that was exactly it... Just found this link: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-02/msg00165.html I ran git config

Re: access to all remote branches

2014-03-11 Thread David Nalesnik
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Benkő Pál wrote: > hi, > > > I've had to reinstall LilyDev, and I'm no longer able to see all of the > > remote branches. When I run > > > > git branch -a > > > > I simply see: > > > > dev/loc

Re: access to all remote branches

2014-03-11 Thread Benkő Pál
hi, > I've had to reinstall LilyDev, and I'm no longer able to see all of the > remote branches. When I run > > git branch -a > > I simply see: > > dev/local_working > master > remotes/origin/master you may have cloned only th

access to all remote branches

2014-03-11 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi, I've had to reinstall LilyDev, and I'm no longer able to see all of the remote branches. When I run git branch -a I simply see: dev/local_working master remotes/origin/master Previously I saw branches from the entire history of the project. Unfortunately, I'm drawing a

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > Delete your lilypond directory and start it fresh with a new git > clone. Of course, back up any work you have first by doing git > format-patch origin and double-check that you have the right > patches. > > It is seriously not worth trying to change your .git/config.

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread Janek Warchoł
2012/2/7 David Kastrup : > Janek Warchoł writes: > >> My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one >> remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of >> that.  I've tried 'git fetch --all', but t

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:51:24AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one > remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of > that. I've tried 'git fetch --all', but the other

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/2/7 David Kastrup : > Francisco Vila writes: > >> 2012/2/7 Janek Warchoł : >>> My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one >>> remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of >>> tha

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread David Kastrup
Francisco Vila writes: > 2012/2/7 Janek Warchoł : >> My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one >> remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of >> that.  I've tried 'git fetch --all', but the

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/2/7 Janek Warchoł : > My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one > remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of > that.  I've tried 'git fetch --all', but the other remote branches do > not appea

Re: having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-07 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł writes: > My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one > remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of > that. I've tried 'git fetch --all', but the other remote branches do > not appea

having trouble fetching all remote branches

2012-02-06 Thread Janek Warchoł
My local repository wasn't created with git clone, and i have only one remote branch ('origin/master'); i cannot push to staging because of that. I've tried 'git fetch --all', but the other remote branches do not appear, and i don't see a solution in git fetch