> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Rehearsal-marks.html#Rehearsal%20marks
Thanks. It works as expected (except the bug with a rehearsal mark
at the start of a line which is not fixed yet).
> One thing I'm not sure about yet: markFormatter as a
> calling-conventio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > The default size of the rehearsal mark `1' is far too small.
> >
> > This is something that we can also solve with barnumber-markup.
>
> Example, please.
See current CVS, and
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Rehearsal-marks.html#R
> > The \default command to increase the rehearsal number produces
> > strange results.
>
> Strange? You mean: you don't want the number font to be used?
Well, it is strange that the `1' is (sometimes?) taken from the normal
text font, and the `2', `3', ... from the number font. Funnily, after
The proper solution is that mark-engraver uses standard marks
as the argument to rehearsalmark, i.e.
\mark "bla"
\mark \markup { foo }
becomes
\mark \markup { \rehearsalmark "bla" }
\mark \markup { foo }
Then rehearsalmark-markup can be defined according to wish. This can
also sol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > there is a \markup command for that , iirc.
>
> Which is good when you want to box a single rehearsal mark, but not
> when you want all of the boxed with a single setting.
> Should I add a short-hand for the property setting
> in ly/property-init.ly ?
I think that th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> % This file shows problems with rehearsal marks in lilypond
> % CVS 2004-01-16 07:44 MET.
> %
> % . The \default command to increase the rehearsal number produces
> % strange results.
Strange? You mean: you don't want the number font to be used?
> % . The default siz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > For rectangles, see
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html#boxed-molecule.ly
>
> Thanks! IMHO boxing rehearsal numbers is quite common, and changing
> molecule-callback is extremely low-level. I vote for a shorthand.
>
> Anyway,
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For rectangles, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html#boxed-molecule.ly
Thanks! IMHO boxing rehearsal numbers is quite common, and changing
molecule-callback is extremely low-level. I vote for a shorthand.
Anyw
> For rectangles, see
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html#boxed-molecule.ly
Thanks! IMHO boxing rehearsal numbers is quite common, and changing
molecule-callback is extremely low-level. I vote for a shorthand.
Anyway, there should be a small remark in the rehe
For rectangles, see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html#boxed-molecule.ly
/Mats
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Besides the bugs shown below, I would like to have a property to
enclose rehearsal marks in either a circle or rectangle (the latter
preferred). Perhaps it is p
Besides the bugs shown below, I would like to have a property to
enclose rehearsal marks in either a circle or rectangle (the latter
preferred). Perhaps it is possible to directly use TeX's
capabilities? To implement this, there could be a property which
describes how to format the rehearsal str
11 matches
Mail list logo
