Re: reduced development time

2012-01-24 Thread David Kastrup
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > On Jan 16, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > >> 2.15.26 is released, containing the fix for issue 1933 >> lilypond-book on windows. This marks the end of my active >> development work for the next ten weeks: until the end of March, I >> am reducing my l

Re: reduced development time

2012-01-16 Thread Janek WarchoĊ‚
2012/1/16 m...@apollinemike.com : > I (like everyone I'm sure) would like to thank you for the work > that you've done on lilypond development. Many thanks from me, too! For your work and for your patience. > I hope it can get farmed out amongst active developers in a way > that makes you want t

Re: reduced development time

2012-01-16 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 04:31:33PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > > Instead, I will end with a plea for more automation. > > I have dabbled in this, mostly because I do not know what is > needed. Python is my native language, so if people could start > an automation wishlist, I can get thi

Re: reduced development time

2012-01-16 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Jan 16, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > 2.15.26 is released, containing the fix for issue 1933 > lilypond-book on windows. This marks the end of my active > development work for the next ten weeks: until the end of March, I > am reducing my lilypond time from 10 hours a week to 5 ho

reduced development time

2012-01-16 Thread Graham Percival
2.15.26 is released, containing the fix for issue 1933 lilypond-book on windows. This marks the end of my active development work for the next ten weeks: until the end of March, I am reducing my lilypond time from 10 hours a week to 5 hours a week. In practice this means that I can reply to email