Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 06:29:03PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le dimanche 04 octobre 2009 à 14:06 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > > Sorry, that would involve too much suckage and conditionals in the > > source file, or macros calling other macros. I agree it's not > > ideal, but it's better

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-09 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 04 octobre 2009 à 14:06 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > Sorry, that would involve too much suckage and conditionals in the > source file, or macros calling other macros. I agree it's not > ideal, but it's better than the alternative. What about naming the frame "All formats" instea

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread Ian Hulin
ly and the reading instructions are grouped neatly together on the right. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 12:13 PM Subject: quick question: web manuals presentation Ok, for the next 12 hours, what do people think

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
r 04, 2009 12:13 PM Subject: quick question: web manuals presentation Ok, for the next 12 hours, what do people think of the format of the manual pages? I tried a few experimental ones, namely: http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Glossary.html http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 02:52:54PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > I would personally favor the second one (Essay.html). Thanks, noted. > Nevertheless, I have a remark for the three of them: > If "read it now" is the same as "xxx (split html)", I would eliminate > this double since it i

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 02:45:50PM +0200, James E. Bailey wrote: >On 04.10.2009, at 13:13, Graham Percival wrote: > > Ok, for the next 12 hours, what do people think of the format of > the manual pages? I tried a few experimental ones, namely: > http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/D

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Le 04/10/2009 13:13, Graham Percival disait : Ok, for the next 12 hours, what do people think of the format of the manual pages? I tried a few experimental ones, namely: http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Glossary.html http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Essay.html The origi

Re: quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread James E. Bailey
On 04.10.2009, at 13:13, Graham Percival wrote: Ok, for the next 12 hours, what do people think of the format of the manual pages? I tried a few experimental ones, namely: http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Glossary.html http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Essay.html The or

quick question: web manuals presentation

2009-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
Ok, for the next 12 hours, what do people think of the format of the manual pages? I tried a few experimental ones, namely: http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Glossary.html http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/Essay.html The original format looks like this: http://kainhofer.com/