Re: printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly (proposed change)

2008-11-07 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/11/6 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I looked through the snippet list and I only found > 4 instances of \new Score. Should be easy to fix. > > grid-lines--changing-their-appearance.ly > grid-lines--emphasizing-rhythms-and-notes-synchronization.ly > printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly >

Re: printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly (proposed change)

2008-11-06 Thread Mark Polesky
2008/11/6 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You don't need \new Score; in fact, no snippet should use this, since > it confuses users. I looked through the snippet list and I only found 4 instances of \new Score. Should be easy to fix. grid-lines--changing-their-appearance.ly grid-lines--em

Re: printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly (proposed change)

2008-11-06 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/11/6 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In the file /input/lsr/printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly, > I propose moving the \with blocks into a single \layout > block. Someone wanting to print marks on every staff of > a large orchestra piece might not realize that a lot of > typing can be saved

printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly (proposed change)

2008-11-06 Thread Mark Polesky
In the file /input/lsr/printing-marks-on-every-staff.ly, I propose moving the \with blocks into a single \layout block. Someone wanting to print marks on every staff of a large orchestra piece might not realize that a lot of typing can be saved since all of the repeated \with blocks can be cons