On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:31:35AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Although, it just struck me, what does MIDI do when it gets a
> dynamic it doesn't recognize? Maybe it's written somewhere; I
> haven't checked.
MIDI doesn't get "dynamics" in terms of mffpf. Rather, note
events have a include "ve
2009/7/25 Jonathan Wilkes :
> There's something in NR 3.5.5 that describes how to control MIDI behavior
> for (custom) dynamics. But if I just use make-dynamic-script to print out
> "ff" or "z" in the score, and I don't use any other dynamics,
> it gets softer when the custom dynamic is u
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00417.html
Oh, I haven't played around with make-dynamic-script yet. I guess it's not
necessary to have a pre-defined command for "pp" and the like,
since it's so easy to add these extreme dynamics as needed. Thanks for
the l
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> I don't know if this needs an additional command, but in
> Tchaikovsky's 6th symphony there is a "pp" (6 p's) during
> the clarinet solo at the end of the exposition.
Yes, and I mentioned the on the last page of book 2 of
the Ligeti etudes. Graham proposed a
I don't know if this needs an additional command, but in Tchaikovsky's 6th
symphony there is a "pp" (6 p's) during the clarinet solo at the end
of the exposition.
What's funny is that he only uses "ff" at the beginning of the next
section, which is one of the loudest orchestral moments I k
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, July 25, 2009 4:29 AM
We all okay with this patch?
LGTM
Of course it's a new command and a syntax change; I don't know if
that means some special process has to be taken; updating the
parser, etc. I have no idea, actually. Let me know.
Nothing else is needed,
We all okay with this patch?
Of course it's a new command and a syntax change; I don't know if
that means some special process has to be taken; updating the
parser, etc. I have no idea, actually. Let me know.
Thanks.
- Mark
0001-Add-dynamic-script-f-update-docs.patch
Description: B
Graham Percival wrote:
on the last page of book 2 of the Ligeti etudes.
Sweet Mao...!
Not that I condone that sort of ridiculous notation.
Yeah, me neither. And if somebody really wants that, they can
look at dynamic-init.ly and figure out how to force lilypond to
2009/6/19 Graham Percival :
> If you'd like to add f for consistency's sake, I'm happy to
> commit it -- but please also add a comment to dynamic-init that we
> really don't want more than 5 letters. :)
The curious thing about this is that there's already an entry for
f in absolute-volum
Jay Anderson writes:
> See page 86 of the first file and page 44 of the second file at the
> Andante non tanto. The strings and the woodwinds are at the full f
> while the brass and percussion are only at :).
Reminds me of that rehearsal joke where the conductor stops the
orchestra, fro
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:33:18PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> dynamic-scripts-init.ly
>>
>> why is there p but no f?
>
> IIRC I asked this 3-4 years ago, and the answer was that somebody
>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:21:29PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > > why is there p but no f?
> >
> > IIRC I asked this 3-4 years ago, and the answer was that somebody
> > had seen p in the literature (a Tchaik symphony
Graham Percival wrote:
> > why is there ppppp but no f?
>
> IIRC I asked this 3-4 years ago, and the answer was that somebody
> had seen p in the literature (a Tchaik symphony, maybe?), but
> nobody had seen a f.
on the last page of book 2 of the Ligeti
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:33:18PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> dynamic-scripts-init.ly
>
> why is there p but no f?
IIRC I asked this 3-4 years ago, and the answer was that somebody
had seen p in the literature (a Tchaik symphony, maybe?), but
nobody had seen a ff
dynamic-scripts-init.ly
why is there p but no f?
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
15 matches
Mail list logo
