On 2012/05/15 07:31:09, Keith wrote:
On 2012/05/15 06:48:09, janek wrote:
> Why don't we get gid of that multiplication?
That is my plan. See Patch Set 1 for a preview. All note-collision
spacing is
scaled by the first down-stem note, so each path through the collision
code
needs to use
http://codereview.appspot.com/6189048/diff/9003/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6189048/diff/9003/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode301
lily/note-collision.cc:301: in calc_positioning_done(), by the width of
the downstem note.
On 2012/05/15 0
LGTM
I apologize that you had to wait. Thank you for your work!!
http://codereview.appspot.com/6189048/diff/9003/input/regression/collision-whole.ly
File input/regression/collision-whole.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6189048/diff/9003/input/regression/collision-whole.ly#newcode16
i
On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:21:54 -0700, wrote:
The interesting thing is that the order of voices matters:
[]
the placement of the notes should be the same in both measures,but it isn't.
The order of voices produces different placement for half notes.
<<
\override Staff.NoteHead #'style = #
http://codereview.appspot.com/6189048/diff/10001/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6189048/diff/10001/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode301
lily/note-collision.cc:301: of the note heads on the sides that
interfere. */
So, should the offsets rea
