no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1 (update)

In the end of July I wrote: > Two days ago I've updated my openSUSE box, which now comes with gs > 9.56.1 – previously, I had gs 9.54.0. This new gs version uses a > brand-new PDF engine written in C, replacing the old one written in > PostScript. > > Building the LilyPond documentation I wonde

Re: no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

Am So., 7. Aug. 2022 um 13:05 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG : > > > > If I build the docs I use 'extractpdfmark' as well. In the light of > > this thread I tried ghostscript self-compiled from their most recent > > master, giving me 9.57.0. [...] > > > > [compilation time] is insane. > > I also notic

Re: no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

> If I build the docs I use 'extractpdfmark' as well. In the light of > this thread I tried ghostscript self-compiled from their most recent > master, giving me 9.57.0. [...] > > [compilation time] is insane. I also noticed a slower documentation build with ghostscript's new PDF engine, but not

Re: no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

Le 07/08/2022 à 11:43, Thomas Morley a écrit : Am Sa., 30. Juli 2022 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG : In case you are forced to use 9.56.1, add `-dNEWPDF=false` to the gs command line options (in file `Documentation/GNUmakefile`) to make gs use the old PDF engine, which produces good r

Re: no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

Am Sa., 30. Juli 2022 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG : > > > >> In case you are forced to use 9.56.1, add `-dNEWPDF=false` to the > >> gs command line options (in file `Documentation/GNUmakefile`) to > >> make gs use the old PDF engine, which produces good results. > > > > So this is about the

Re: no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

>> In case you are forced to use 9.56.1, add `-dNEWPDF=false` to the >> gs command line options (in file `Documentation/GNUmakefile`) to >> make gs use the old PDF engine, which produces good results. > > So this is about the post-processing step with extractpdfmark + gs, > right? Yes – I always

Re: no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 09:44 +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Two days ago I've updated my openSUSE box, which now comes with gs > 9.56.1 – previously, I had gs 9.54.0.  This new gs version uses a > brand-new PDF engine written in C, replacing the old one written in > PostScript. To clarify: As I alr

no links in PDFs with gs 9.56.1

Two days ago I've updated my openSUSE box, which now comes with gs 9.56.1 – previously, I had gs 9.54.0. This new gs version uses a brand-new PDF engine written in C, replacing the old one written in PostScript. Building the LilyPond documentation I wondered why the new output file size of `nota