> Le 3 avr. 2023 à 15:34, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
> Yes. There is no equivalent to `glyphshow` in PDF. For some comments
> on that see, for example,
>
> https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698305#c10
> https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695259
OK, thanks.
> BTW,
>>> Essentially, this option switches between the `show` and `glyphshow`
>>> PostScript operators to access Emmentaler glyphs. The former is
>>> considered the 'standard' method for accessing glyphs in a PS file
>>> (according to the GS developers); however, it needs properly set up
>>> encoding
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le dimanche 02 avril 2023 à 18:20 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>> Essentially, this option switches between the `show` and `glyphshow`
>> PostScript operators to access Emmentaler glyphs. The former is
>> considered the 'standard' method for accessing glyphs in a PS
Le dimanche 02 avril 2023 à 18:20 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> Essentially, this option switches between the `show` and `glyphshow`
> PostScript operators to access Emmentaler glyphs. The former is
> considered the 'standard' method for accessing glyphs in a PS file
> (according to the GS dev
> Would anyone be able to explain me what the purpose of the
> music-font-encodings option is? I'm trying to understand how the
> generation of the Emmentaler font works. I see that there is quite
> a bit of infrastructure for this option, which is used in
> `--pspdfopt`, b
Hi,
Would anyone be able to explain me what the purpose of the music-font-encodings
option is? I'm trying to understand how the generation of the Emmentaler font
works. I see that there is quite a bit of infrastructure for this option, which
is used in `--pspdfopt`, but it's not c
