On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:42:27PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > What do people think about adding an extra mailing list:
> > lilypond-proposals?
>
> I agree with Werner; I think it is overkill. If you want to have more
> process,
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009 16:58:38 schrieb Graham Percival:
> Recent questions that I think would qualify:
> - splitting web/ into a separate git repository.
> - syntax for the postfix crescendi/decrescendi stuff.
> - what we need to include in 2.14 (i.e. "what do we delay it for",
> not "what do
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> What do people think about adding an extra mailing list:
> lilypond-proposals?
I agree with Werner; I think it is overkill. If you want to have more
process, we could try add [PROPOSAL] or RFD: to the subject line of
the mails discussing
> What do people think about adding an extra mailing list:
> lilypond-proposals?
I dislike that. Two lists are fully sufficient IMHO. Probably all
lilypond-devel readers would subscribe that too, so where's the
benefit? It makes discussion more complicated if someone is
discussing a problem on
Graham Percival wrote:
What do people think about adding an extra mailing list:
lilypond-proposals?
Would this include Documentation proposals from people willing to do them?
This would be a LOW-volume list for developers to get feedback
about changes (from both other developers and, in some
What do people think about adding an extra mailing list:
lilypond-proposals?
This would be a LOW-volume list for developers to get feedback
about changes (from both other developers and, in some cases,
users). Proposals and questions would *only* be sent by
developers who were willing to do all t
