On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:41:37PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> So using a recent enough kernel should get rid of that annoyance.
No; although recent kernels have no maximum length of arguments in
total, they still impose a maximum length of a *single* argument.
And our build system puts all the
On Mo., 5. Sep. 2011 23:41:37 CEST, David Kastrup wrote:
> So using a recent enough kernel should get rid of that annoyance.
I'm using 2.6.38-11 on ubuntu and I could reproduce the problem...
Cheers,
Reinhold
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Montag, 5. September 2011, 23:09:14 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> May i ask for a very short explanation of what was wrong? Were there
>> too many regtest files in the directory and this made it impossible to
>> compile them, and therefore check them?
>
> The makefile
2011/9/5 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Am Montag, 5. September 2011, 23:09:14 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> May i ask for a very short explanation of what was wrong? Were there
>> too many regtest files in the directory and this made it impossible to
>> compile them, and therefore check them?
>
> The makefil
Am Montag, 5. September 2011, 23:09:14 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> May i ask for a very short explanation of what was wrong? Were there
> too many regtest files in the directory and this made it impossible to
> compile them, and therefore check them?
The makefile in input/regression/ collects all re
2011/8/30 Graham Percival :
> We haven't had a release in a month. More to the point, we
> haven't had a regtest comparison in a month. But we've had lots
> of patches go in.
>
> I will bet money that we have at least 3 regressions. I will also
> bet money that at least 1 of them is from a devel
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:15:15AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Tuesday, 30. August 2011, 07:39:06 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > This abomination was pushed as
> > a330f10f9fdf00408598031f4b2cb691039b2c92
>
> Can we revert this regtest merge again, now that the build should work in
> that
Am Tuesday, 30. August 2011, 07:39:06 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:25:44AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > As a temporary workaround, I will now reduce the number of
> > regression tests. In particular, I will merge the segfault
> > regtests -- we don't care about the ou
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: merging regtests
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:39:06AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:25:44AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> As a temporary
bad27
d8aeaf1879b7ded03c3f96803e4f8419a8cf64ed
c28c0c9f5d43b32e77ee060288e5006ee6be8b5b
GUB is now compiling the docs, so the current crisis is over. I
estimate that this has "bought us" another 1-2 weeks. At that
point, we'll be back to the non-release situation again.
I tried to make sure I was
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:25:44AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> As a temporary workaround, I will now reduce the number of
> regression tests. In particular, I will merge the segfault
> regtests -- we don't care about the output of those; we just want
> to make sure that lilypond doesn't crash.
We haven't had a release in a month. More to the point, we
haven't had a regtest comparison in a month. But we've had lots
of patches go in.
I will bet money that we have at least 3 regressions. I will also
bet money that at least 1 of them is from a developer who is going
on vacation soon. (n
12 matches
Mail list logo
