Re: list of feature requests

2004-05-27 Thread Erik Sandberg
(resending, forgot to cc to list) On Thursday 27 May 2004 00.30, you wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > > We could store them, but we have to divert energy into maintaining > > that list, which is a waste IMO. Also, past experience with TODO lists > > shows that they tend to fill up with useless

Re: list of feature requests

2004-05-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > We could store them, but we have to divert energy into maintaining > that list, which is a waste IMO. Also, past experience with TODO lists > shows that they tend to fill up with useless requests. I concur with > Mats that the mailing list is much better inspiration for

Re: list of feature requests

2004-05-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On the other hand, the advantage of not having a feature request > > list easily accessible on the WWW is that popular feature requests > > will be repeated multiple times on the mailing lists, whereas if > > users see that the request already is listed, they don't rep

Re: list of feature requests

2004-05-25 Thread Pedro Kroger
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I definitely support the idea of a feature request list. > Having a list on paper should make it easier to prioritize > and it may also happen that when you see the full list, you > find out that one change in the code could solve a number of > these re

Re: list of feature requests

2004-05-25 Thread Mats Bengtsson
this. The coders know what they want to do (see http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/workbook/TODO), and feature requests are mostly replied with something like "yes, that's a good idea, you are welcome to implement it". Would anyone have any use for a list of

list of feature requests

2004-05-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > Since the bugs reports are being organized now, do you think that the > request for features should also be organized? It doesn't have to be > anything fancy, a plain list would do. We could, but does it solve anything? People will implement features to scratch

Re: list of feature requests

2004-05-24 Thread Erik Sandberg
for this. The coders know what they want to do (see http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/workbook/TODO), and feature requests are mostly replied with something like "yes, that's a good idea, you are welcome to implement it". Would anyone have any use for

list of feature requests

2004-05-24 Thread Pedro Kroger
Hi, Since the bugs reports are being organized now, do you think that the request for features should also be organized? It doesn't have to be anything fancy, a plain list would do. Pedro ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.g