Re: links in LSR snippets

2009-02-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:06:13PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > To anticipate a possible objection: the snippets are not designed to > > teach lilypond basics. > > A logical corrolary: LSR files must not refer to the documentation (or > rather, to exact locations in the docs); instead, the

Re: links in LSR snippets

2009-02-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> LSR files sometimes refer to the manual. Example: > > I almost consider this a bug, especially if they reference the LM. Yep. > ... we *could* add a special "html" command for these in LSR. They > would do nothing in the main LSR view, but when we run makelsr.py, > we could change the new

Re: links in LSR snippets

2009-02-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 08:46:50AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > LSR files sometimes refer to the manual. Example: I almost consider this a bug, especially if they reference the LM. > Such references to absolute section numbers are error-prone; > additionally, there is no proper hyperlink.

links in LSR snippets

2009-02-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
LSR files sometimes refer to the manual. Example: makam-example.ly: (see the `Learning Manual @version{}, 4.6.3 Other sources of information' for the location of this file) Such references to absolute section numbers are error-prone; additionally, there is no proper hyperlink. Any ide