Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-07-14 Thread k-ohara5a5a
http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/20001/lily/bar-line.cc File lily/bar-line.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/20001/lily/bar-line.cc#newcode151 lily/bar-line.cc:151: Real const gap_to_find = (1.0 + 3 * staffline) / staff_space; It seems you want Real const gap_to_fi

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-07-10 Thread Benkő Pál
hi Keith, 2012/7/10 : > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/20001/lily/bar-line.cc > File lily/bar-line.cc (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/20001/lily/bar-line.cc#newcode151 > lily/bar-line.cc:151: Real const gap_to_find = (1.0 + 3 * staffline) / > staff_space; > P

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-07-10 Thread k-ohara5a5a
http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/20001/lily/bar-line.cc File lily/bar-line.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/20001/lily/bar-line.cc#newcode151 lily/bar-line.cc:151: Real const gap_to_find = (1.0 + 3 * staffline) / staff_space; Pál, see new issue 2648 on the tracker

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-05-25 Thread Benkő Pál
hi Keith, thanks for your review. 2012/5/23 : > Looks good to me. > > The regtest changes look like improvements, > although I wonder if the time-signature and repeat dots should simply > center around the line closest to zero.  If a user sets his > line-positions entirely below zero, he might /

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-05-22 Thread k-ohara5a5a
Looks good to me. The regtest changes look like improvements, although I wonder if the time-signature and repeat dots should simply center around the line closest to zero. If a user sets his line-positions entirely below zero, he might /want/ the time-signature above his staff lines. Why else w

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-05-15 Thread k-ohara5a5a
Pál, I'm not on a system today that can compile Lilypond so I cannot look at the points you asked about, at least not today. I hope someone else can. http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/beam.cc File lily/beam.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#n

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-05-14 Thread benko . pal
http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/beam.cc File lily/beam.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/beam.cc#newcode1282 lily/beam.cc:1282: staff_span *= 0.5 / staff_space; division is silly and works only because staff_space is generally 1. http://codereview.a

Re: line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-05-14 Thread graham
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

2012-05-13 Thread benko . pal
Reviewers: , http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/slur-scoring.cc File lily/slur-scoring.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/slur-scoring.cc#newcode593 lily/slur-scoring.cc:593: && Staff_symbol_referencer::on_staff_line (on_staff, (int) rint (pos))) this c