Re: lilypond vs. GNU/LilyPond

2009-06-22 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > On the new website, I'm following the previous website which > simply wrote "LilyPond".  Does anybody want to make a strong case > in favor of replacing this with "GNU/LilyPond" everywhere? If you want that, write GNU LilyPond, without the

Re: lilypond vs. GNU/LilyPond

2009-06-22 Thread Mark Polesky
Bertalan Fodor wrote: > > On the new website, I'm following the previous website > > which simply wrote "LilyPond". Does anybody want to make > > a strong case in favor of replacing this with "GNU/LilyPond" > > everywhere? > > > > (or maybe just once or twice, in the intro or something like > >

Re: lilypond vs. GNU/LilyPond

2009-06-22 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/22 Graham Percival : > On the new website, I'm following the previous website which > simply wrote "LilyPond".  Does anybody want to make a strong case > in favor of replacing this with "GNU/LilyPond" everywhere? If you are talking by similarness with GNU/Linux against Linux, it's not the s

Re: lilypond vs. GNU/LilyPond

2009-06-21 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
I hope nobody. For a potential user, the term GNU is incomprehensible. Bert Graham Percival wrote: On the new website, I'm following the previous website which simply wrote "LilyPond". Does anybody want to make a strong case in favor of replacing this with "GNU/LilyPond" everywhere? (or maybe

lilypond vs. GNU/LilyPond

2009-06-21 Thread Graham Percival
On the new website, I'm following the previous website which simply wrote "LilyPond". Does anybody want to make a strong case in favor of replacing this with "GNU/LilyPond" everywhere? (or maybe just once or twice, in the intro or something like that?) Cheers, - Graham