Hi,
- the people responsible need to be there with an email address to
send complaints to.
- names don't need to be i18n'd , so drop the _ ("...")
2008/3/1, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Look fine to me.
>
> John, could you apply these? The only branch I have checked out
> is master,
Look fine to me.
John, could you apply these? The only branch I have checked out
is master, and I am *not* going to play with git until my lilypond
time falls below 2 hours a day.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:47:19 +0100
Ivo Bouwmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Graham,
>
>
2008/2/26, Matthias Neeracher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I remember reading about a script to automate packaging up a Fink
> > package plus its dependencies. I think this would be the easiest
> > road, since getting our GUB framework up and running on darwin will be
> > hell. I'll see if I can
On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:58 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2008/2/26, Matthias Neeracher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was able to get ahold of him today, and the news is not good. He
says he hasn't maintained the package in quite some time. It might be
time to consider a different build strategy.
Dang -
[+ lily-devel ]
2008/2/26, Matthias Neeracher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was able to get ahold of him today, and the news is not good. He
> says he hasn't maintained the package in quite some time. It might be
> time to consider a different build strategy.
Dang - this is annoying, because MacOS
Dear developers,
I am not a developer of Lilypond as such, but I made a contribution to
the use of Lilypond on Mac OS X Leopard (which is a known issue) by
writing an AppleScript. With this script, users without experience with
the command line or script writing can use Lilypond (again).
Som
Sven Axelsson wrote:
> OK, I know. The standard reply to the Lilypond vs. Lopard question is
> "compile it yourself". I could do that, but I believe it is a bit more
> complicated than just
>
> make
> sudo make install
>
> so it wold be easier if someone who has done this already could m
OK, I know. The standard reply to the Lilypond vs. Lopard question is
"compile it yourself". I could do that, but I believe it is a bit more
complicated than just
make
sudo make install
so it wold be easier if someone who has done this already could make
an unofficial build available. Any
Please see the bug tracker for previous discussion about this.
Cheers,
- Graham
claudio wrote:
Will be made a new version of
Lilypond fornew MacOSX Leopard?
thanks claudio
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
Will be made a new version of
Lilypond fornew MacOSX Leopard?
thanks claudio
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo
