Re: lilypond does *not* need metafont

2008-08-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 26. August 2008 schrieb Patrick McCarty: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:58:19AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > lilypond needs metapost, not metafont, for building the fonts! The > > binary is normally called `mpost' or `mp'. > > Hi Werner

Re: lilypond does *not* need metafont

2008-08-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > lilypond needs metapost, not metafont, for building the fonts! The > > binary is normally called `mpost' or `mp'. > > Are you sure about this? Ah, my mistake. I meant `needs both metapost and metafont', sorry. Werner ___ lilypond-devel ma

Re: lilypond does *not* need metafont

2008-08-26 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:58:19AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > lilypond needs metapost, not metafont, for building the fonts! The > binary is normally called `mpost' or `mp'. Hi Werner, Are you sure about this? Looking at one of my `make all' logs, the following two lines appear, once for

lilypond does *not* need metafont

2008-08-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Reinhold, lilypond needs metapost, not metafont, for building the fonts! The binary is normally called `mpost' or `mp'. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel