s.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
m...@apollinemike.com [m...@apollinemike.com]
Sent: 05 January 2011 12:29
To: Graham Percival
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: lilypond authors, release notes, announcements
Hey Graham,
Could you plea
Hey Graham,
Could you please put me under "programming"?
Thanks!
Mike
On Jan 5, 2011, at 12:44 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
>
> - could any new contributors check:
> http://lilypond.org/authors.html
> to make sure they're there
On 2011-01-05 15:17, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
>>> Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos ver
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:43:47PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:38 +, Graham Percival wrote:
> > I think you should be listed in both places; I certainly don't
> > think you should removed from the Documentation list. If somebody
> > has worked in multiples areas, th
On 1/5/11 3:43 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:59:58PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
>> Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
>>
>>> Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I
>>> think it would be appropriate to remove my name
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:38 +, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:30:29PM +, James wrote:
> > Colin,
> >
> > On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
> > >On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >You should probably move me from Documentation to Bu
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:59:58PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
>
> > Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I
> > think it would be appropriate to remove my name from the "Current
> > development team" list.
>
>
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
> Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I think
> it would be appropriate to remove my name from the "Current development team"
> list.
Mine too, please. I don't think I've done anything in this release.
Nicolas
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:30:29PM +, James wrote:
> Colin,
>
> On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
> >On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
>
> >
> >You should probably move me from Documentation to Bug Squad, James. At
> >the moment, I don't think I can manage both, but pe
Colin,
On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
You should probably move me from Documentation to Bug Squad, James. At
the moment, I don't think I can manage both, but perhaps I can return to
the fold later in the year!
No problem.
James
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:17:51PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > That looks quite "busy" to my taste. My latest 5-minute hack is
> > something like this:
>
> Attached is a small modification (created in inkscape rather tha
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
> >> I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
> >> they end up too cl
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:20:06 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
> Yup, that's what I meant. I know a couple of amateur musicians who
> copied some musical symbols to replace single characters of their names
> for their letterheads. I can't think of a single one which doesn't look
> ugly. Sizes
Am 05.01.2011 13:33, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something q
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
>> I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
>> they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
>> together, just for the sa
On 2011-01-05 12:58, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
>> I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
>> they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
>> together, just for the sake of quoting
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
> I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
> they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
> together, just for the sake of quoting musical symbols.
You mean something like this?
2011/1/5 Graham Percival
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
> > Marc,
> > What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
> > LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
> > in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a 'logotype' o
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:11:26AM +, James wrote:
> Hello
>
> On 05/01/2011 10:36, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> >>I've mused about trying to create a logo using the markup
> >>commands. If you think about all the graphical ones, plus music
> >>glyphs, there's a lot of options. The "d" could be
On 2011-01-05 12:11, James wrote:
> No this isn't what I was referring to. [...]
> I was thinking more of a 'lilypond' in some
> cursive-cum-signature-cum-all-joined-up script,
> but something 'created' as a glyph than just put together.
>
> If you think of J S Bach's signature then that could be
Hello
On 05/01/2011 10:36, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2011-01-05 11:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Could I please ask Graham or
> some other kind soul to edit the file and move my name to an
> appropriate place (perhaps the trash bin :-) ).
Good heavens, we couldn't put your name in the trash bin! No, the
appropriate thing is
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in "development team", and choose your own title. If not,
you should be listed in "curren
On 2011-01-05 11:13, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
>> Marc,
>> What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
>> LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
>> in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a
Am 05.01.2011 11:09, schrieb James:
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
It helps the 'be
On 2011-01-05 11:09, James wrote:
> Marc,
>
> On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
>> My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
>> sign
>> (which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
>
> Au contraire mon amis!
>
> I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
> Marc,
> What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
> LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
> in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a 'logotype' or
> colophon.
>
> tagline = \markup {
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
It helps the 'beginners' (I find) that I play with as
Am 05.01.2011 10:32, schrieb James:
Hello,
On 05/01/2011 05:44, Graham Percival wrote:
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in
Hello,
On 05/01/2011 05:44, Graham Percival wrote:
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in "development team", and choose your
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in "development team", and choose your own title. If not,
you should be listed in "current co
31 matches
Mail list logo
