[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > However, I suppose we will still need some glue scripting, though.
>
> What do you mean with `glue scripting'?
We need some code to get our glyphnames into the PFA, don't we?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
> Oh, BTW- I talked with Jan about the text fonts. Our guess is that
> CMR is already reasonably close to a music text font.
Only the italic shape IMHO. I don't like the upright shape of CM very
much.
> We should probably make a private "lilypond-modern" variant of CMR
> (preferably with accen
> However, I suppose we will still need some glue scripting, though.
What do you mean with `glue scripting'?
> Also, I have the impression (not sure, though) that the parmesan
> files will need a lot more work, since they use shaped pens. Have
> you investigated that?
Yes. My changes don't af
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw,
> > the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex. Am I missing
> > something?
>
> Sorry for not announcing -- I thought that the advantages are obvious:
> Exact generation of the music glyphs, no nee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Prepare glyph shapes for mf2pt1 conversion.
> >
> > Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw,
> > the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex. Am I missing
> > something?
>
> Sorry for not announcing -- I thought that the advantages ar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Prepare glyph shapes for mf2pt1 conversion.
> >
> > Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw,
> > the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex. Am I missing
> > something?
>
> Sorry for not announcing -- I thought that the advantages ar
> > Prepare glyph shapes for mf2pt1 conversion.
>
> Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw,
> the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex. Am I missing
> something?
Sorry for not announcing -- I thought that the advantages are obvious:
Exact generation of the mus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Log message:
> Prepare glyph shapes for mf2pt1 conversion.
Why are you doing this? I have the impression that without filldraw,
the MF code becomes (slightly) more complex. Am I missing something?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.
