RE: landscape mode vs. new paper size

2011-04-01 Thread James Lowe
Graham, )-Original Message- )From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca] )Sent: 01 April 2011 16:27 )To: James Lowe )Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: landscape mode vs. new paper size ) )On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:50:07PM +, James Lowe wrote: )> That's OK

Re: landscape mode vs. new paper size

2011-04-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:50:07PM +, James Lowe wrote: > That's OK, we can still do this with 'proper' paper sizes with > internationally defined names rather than our own custom ones. > > For example, we could define some 'C' sizes which are used for > defining envelopes, are as internationa

Re: landscape mode vs. new paper size

2011-03-27 Thread James Lowe
Graham, . On 26 Mar 2011, at 21:03, "Graham Percival" wrote: > Hi James, > > I managed to add a [landscape] option to @lilypond, but it prints > music rotate 90 degrees. In retrospect, that should have been > obvious -- that's exactly what we want landscape to do! But it's > not useful for th

landscape mode vs. new paper size

2011-03-26 Thread Graham Percival
Hi James, I managed to add a [landscape] option to @lilypond, but it prints music rotate 90 degrees. In retrospect, that should have been obvious -- that's exactly what we want landscape to do! But it's not useful for the NR 3 spacing chapter. How about defining a spacing-doc (icky name) page s